2.6-1 2010 06 28
- Fixed (): Classes as Sub-Libraries caused error as Namespace was incorrect
Damn! forgot about Neil's post, have done that now - for next release
Posted 26 June 2010 - 09:20 PM
Posted 27 June 2010 - 06:57 PM
Certified LabVIEW Architect
Dak's First Law of Problem Solving: If the solution looks simple, I don't know enough about the problem.
Yes, the QSM is flexible. So is Jello. That doesn't make it good construction material.
There are two secrets to success:
Secret #1 - Never tell everything you know.
Posted 27 June 2010 - 11:18 PM
YesHmm... the theme creator needs the icon editor api package v2.0, but apparently I'm too stupid to find it. Can I have a hint?
Installation and instructions:
Posted 28 June 2010 - 12:13 AM
I tried... I really did... For the life of me I can't figure out how to parse that to mean, "download the zip file if you don't have the dependency."VIPC file included for dependencies (list only), repackaged Icon Editor API included as package.
How's that?
Are you sure about that?So its in the .zip version not the package version downloadable.
Ahhhhh... better.But you can get it here from my post too
Me? I don't ever have opinions...If you have any feedback to make this better please let me know too. I would be very interested in what you think.
Certified LabVIEW Architect
Dak's First Law of Problem Solving: If the solution looks simple, I don't know enough about the problem.
Yes, the QSM is flexible. So is Jello. That doesn't make it good construction material.
There are two secrets to success:
Secret #1 - Never tell everything you know.
Posted 28 June 2010 - 01:32 AM
I tried... I really did... For the life of me I can't figure out how to parse that to mean, "download the zip file if you don't have the dependency."
But like I said, I'm a little slow.
Yes, veryAre you sure about that?
VIPC file included for dependencies (list only), repackaged Icon Editor API included as package
Dependencies:
jgcode_rpk_ni_icon_editor_api>=2.0
Posted 28 June 2010 - 02:58 PM
I see it now. I've evaluated VIPM configuration files and like the feature, but since I don't work with them regularly it didn't even occur to me to try applying the configuration. (Had I noticed the vipc file's size I might have figured it out.)
- By this I mean the dependent packages are listed by name but are not physically inside the .vipc file.
- However, in this case, the exception is the Icon Editor API package
Can't dispute your reasoning. Curious, why didn't you put the Theme Creator package in the vipc file?
- My logic is that some files are easy to get to (through the VI Package Network) and some are harder to get access to (e.g. Icon Editor API you would have to go to the post)
- So I include the harder ones in the .vipc file as a physical package - as I think this is generally easier for the user.
I noticed that in the changelist. Thanks!I have now included all other reuse VIs internally in the code
Certified LabVIEW Architect
Dak's First Law of Problem Solving: If the solution looks simple, I don't know enough about the problem.
Yes, the QSM is flexible. So is Jello. That doesn't make it good construction material.
There are two secrets to success:
Secret #1 - Never tell everything you know.
Posted 28 June 2010 - 11:17 PM
Curious, why didn't you put the Theme Creator package in the vipc file?
Posted 29 June 2010 - 12:39 AM
Not at all, I was just curious. Had I been more familiar with vipc files I likey would have clued in to the dependency right away. If the zip file had contained only the vipc file (with the package inside) I *might* have figured it out. Once I saw the package in the zip file I completely disregarded the vipc file.I am guessing you would prefer it in one file?
Certified LabVIEW Architect
Dak's First Law of Problem Solving: If the solution looks simple, I don't know enough about the problem.
Yes, the QSM is flexible. So is Jello. That doesn't make it good construction material.
There are two secrets to success:
Secret #1 - Never tell everything you know.
Posted 29 June 2010 - 01:11 AM
Not at all, I was just curious. Had I been more familiar with vipc files I likey would have clued in to the dependency right away. If the zip file had contained only the vipc file (with the package inside) I *might* have figured it out. Once I saw the package in the zip file I completely disregarded the vipc file.
No need to change your distro. A better solution is to get smarter users....![]()
Posted 29 June 2010 - 03:15 AM
VIPM will make me smarter? Sign me up for 11 copies!That's ok as VIPM 2010 will have a cool new feature that will have you covered
![]()
Certified LabVIEW Architect
Dak's First Law of Problem Solving: If the solution looks simple, I don't know enough about the problem.
Yes, the QSM is flexible. So is Jello. That doesn't make it good construction material.
There are two secrets to success:
Secret #1 - Never tell everything you know.
Posted 29 June 2010 - 03:26 AM
VIPM will make me smarter? Sign me up for 11 copies!
Posted 20 July 2010 - 01:02 PM
Posted 26 July 2010 - 11:17 AM
Posted 17 September 2010 - 01:55 PM
Posted 17 September 2010 - 10:43 PM
Posted 18 September 2010 - 12:29 PM
Certified LabVIEW Architect
Dak's First Law of Problem Solving: If the solution looks simple, I don't know enough about the problem.
Yes, the QSM is flexible. So is Jello. That doesn't make it good construction material.
There are two secrets to success:
Secret #1 - Never tell everything you know.
Posted 18 September 2010 - 02:21 PM
Public Service Announcement
François [frɑ̃swa], CLA
Posted 18 September 2010 - 02:42 PM
Posted 18 September 2010 - 03:52 PM
Firstly, it was "Miller High Life", and secondly, it was in a camo can so people wouldn't know that I was drinking itThis feature was sponsored by:
![]()
Where drinking from a camouflaged can... ...makes you look tough.
I like it (not sure why that functionality isn't there in base LabVIEW, although I usually use the Endevo GDS for cloning), but I'm not sure it's intuative. For example, you're opening your tool and cloning a method from one class to another, but I find it difficult to know which method I'm cloning once I'm in the assistant. I guess project explorer integration would help this (eg: right click on a method and choose "Clone", then have a dialog that lets me select the target class <- that's how the Endevo GDS works). This would men breaking up your assitant's functionalites to groups (no longer a monolithic UI), but I think that would be more intuative in the long run.Feature Request: Clone a Method VI
I have updated the repository with a new version - you can now easily clone a method using this tool.
btw: The reason that I'm suggesting changes is that I think that this tool has a real future - as I said, there's some stuff in it that I think should be included in LabVIEW by default, so I think it's probably a good time to start discussing use cases outside of your own, writing down features and planning out medium-term goals for it.I like it (not sure why that functionality isn't there in base LabVIEW, although I usually use the Endevo GDS for cloning), but I'm not sure it's intuative. For example, you're opening your tool and cloning a method from one class to another, but I find it difficult to know which method I'm cloning once I'm in the assistant. I guess project explorer integration would help this (eg: right click on a method and choose "Clone", then have a dialog that lets me select the target class <- that's how the Endevo GDS works). This would men breaking up your assitant's functionalites to groups (no longer a monolithic UI), but I think that would be more intuative in the long run.

Posted 18 September 2010 - 07:47 PM
I like it...
I like it...
Certified LabVIEW Architect
Dak's First Law of Problem Solving: If the solution looks simple, I don't know enough about the problem.
Yes, the QSM is flexible. So is Jello. That doesn't make it good construction material.
There are two secrets to success:
Secret #1 - Never tell everything you know.