<sigh>... I wonder which path to choose?
Edited by jzoller, 21 January 2011 - 04:13 PM.
Posted 21 January 2011 - 04:12 PM
Posted 21 January 2011 - 05:01 PM
Posted 21 January 2011 - 05:05 PM
Posted 21 January 2011 - 05:53 PM
Posted 21 January 2011 - 07:08 PM
Yep, the problem went away when I quit LV...decisions decisions...
I bet you can't select to use either one (I noticed the "Use Selected Item" button was greyed out).
If I get lightning, I'm going dark side. Sorry.Let the force guide you my son.
Someday, Wait (ms) may have error terminals.Well you are waiting...on an error...hmmm how Common is that????
Posted 21 January 2011 - 07:40 PM
+ 1 kudos. And while they're at it they can do the same with tick count, and wait next ms tick.The idea has enough Kudos. But still wait for the "In Development" status to come up.
Posted 21 January 2011 - 08:14 PM

POPULAR
+ 1 kudos. And while they're at it they can do the same with tick count, and wait next ms tick.
Posted 21 January 2011 - 09:07 PM
I would suggest replacing them in the palette (like the space constantI added VI wrappers with error terminals for Wait (ms), Wait Until Next ms Multiple, and Tick Count in LV 2011. Look for them in vi.lib\Utility\timing. They're not the ideal solution, but until we get error terminals on the primitives, at least we can stop having to worry about maintaining our own copies.
-D
Edited by ShaunR, 21 January 2011 - 09:07 PM.
Posted 06 April 2011 - 11:21 PM
Posted 07 April 2011 - 01:03 AM
Looks like I spoke too soon. Based on some beta feedback, and after discussing the issue further in-house, I will not be including these VIs in 2011. Hopefully, we'll see native support for the error terminals on the primitives themselves in a future LabVIEW version.