LabVIEW is an irrelevant programming language
#1
Posted 31 May 2007 - 05:17 PM
#2
Posted 31 May 2007 - 05:26 PM
I have just posted a new article on my blog:
Thanks,
One could certainly argue that book sales are not representative of a language's popularity, as the blogger assumes, but instead are reflections of the steepness of the language's learning curve or the usefulness of the environment's online help.
#3
#4
Posted 31 May 2007 - 06:16 PM
Want to help LabVIEW become more relevant in the computer book market? Why not buy a good LabVIEW book
Now that was a beautifully executed shameless plug!
Jaegen
#5
Posted 31 May 2007 - 06:50 PM
Right - basing a language's popularity on book sales is poor science at best, manipulative at worst.
Crelf,
Yes you are right,I second you :thumbup:
Certified LabVIEW Architect
Ohiofudu Israel
#6
Posted 31 May 2007 - 08:19 PM
Absolutely - I was as digusted as you are at Jim's pathetic attempt to push innocent LAVA members toward his book! Maybe he was the original blog author too?Now that was a beautifully executed shameless plug!
On a completely unrelated topic - check this out:

Image Acquisition and Processing with LabVIEW
Christopher G. Relf V I Engineering, Inc., Farmington Hills, Michigan, USASeries: Image Processing Series Volume: 5
List Price: $119.95
Web Price: $107.96
You Save: $11.99
Cat. #: 1480
ISBN: 9780849314803
ISBN 10: 0849314801
Publication Date: 7/28/2003
Number of Pages: 264
Availability: In Stock

#7
Posted 31 May 2007 - 08:59 PM
#8
Posted 31 May 2007 - 11:33 PM
Now that was a beautifully executed shameless plug!QUOTE(Jim Kring)
Want to help LabVIEW become more relevant in the computer book market? Why not buy a good LabVIEW book
Jaegen
Thanks! And, thank you for the extra coverage
#9
Posted 01 June 2007 - 01:50 PM
Now that was a beautifully executed shameless plug!
![]()
Jaegen
Thanks! And, thank you for the extra coverage
Concidering how LTR fell by the wayside and was replaced by LAVA, and other on-line forums, it appears that it is printed media that is becoming irrelevant .
Ben
Discalimer: Years ago I gave up a living room in favor of a library.
#10
Posted 01 June 2007 - 02:58 PM
Agreed about popularity, and that is even more true about basing a language's supposed relevance on book sales. Considering how much emphasis is placed on quality control, testing, 6 sigma, etc, today, everything manuafactured is or will be tested to meet regulations and standards for safety, quality, etc. Many of us fly on jetliners regularly, whose components and systems are tested adn certified with LabVIEW, same for our cars, cell phones, the computers we are looking at now, the network components linking us on LAVA, the optical fiber, etc, etc.Right - basing a language's popularity on book sales is poor science at best, manipulative at worst.
I'd say LabVIEW indirectly touches the lives of most people in the Western world almost every day in a positive way. My current project is fuel cell research and testing, which might be relevant to an internationally debated topic or two.
LabVIEW Irrelevant? ROTFLOL !
#11
Posted 26 June 2007 - 07:22 PM












