Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

LabVIEW is an irrelevant programming language


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 Jim Kring

Jim Kring

    packages everywhere!

  • JKI
  • 1,901 posts
  • Location:Lafayette, CA
  • Version:LabVIEW 2011
  • Since:1995

Posted 31 May 2007 - 05:17 PM

I have just posted a new article on my blog:Thanks,

#2 Gary Rubin

Gary Rubin

    The 500 club

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 612 posts
  • Location:Northern Virginia, USA
  • Version:LabVIEW 8.6
  • Since:1997

Posted 31 May 2007 - 05:26 PM

QUOTE(Jim Kring @ May 30 2007, 11:56 AM)

I have just posted a new article on my blog:

Thanks,


One could certainly argue that book sales are not representative of a language's popularity, as the blogger assumes, but instead are reflections of the steepness of the language's learning curve or the usefulness of the environment's online help.

#3 crelf

crelf

    I'm a LAVA, not a fighter.

  • V I Engineering, Inc.
  • 5,742 posts
  • Version:LabVIEW 2012
  • Since:1993

Posted 31 May 2007 - 05:53 PM

QUOTE(Gary Rubin @ May 31 2007, 02:05 AM)

...reflections of the steepness of the language's learning curve or the usefulness of the environment's online help.

Right - basing a language's popularity on book sales is poor science at best, manipulative at worst.

post-181-1170858537.png


#4 jaegen

jaegen

    Very Active

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 152 posts
  • Location:Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • Version:LabVIEW 2011
  • Since:1998

Posted 31 May 2007 - 06:16 PM

QUOTE(Jim Kring)

Want to help LabVIEW become more relevant in the computer book market? Why not buy a good LabVIEW book Posted Image


Now that was a beautifully executed shameless plug! :P

Jaegen

#5 ohiofudu

ohiofudu

    Very Active

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 61 posts
  • Location:Germany
  • Version:LabVIEW 2011
  • Since:2000

Posted 31 May 2007 - 06:50 PM

QUOTE(crelf @ May 30 2007, 11:32 AM)

Right - basing a language's popularity on book sales is poor science at best, manipulative at worst.


Crelf,

Yes you are right,I second you :thumbup:
Do it Now...do it Now... Now over Procastination
Certified LabVIEW Architect
Ohiofudu Israel

#6 crelf

crelf

    I'm a LAVA, not a fighter.

  • V I Engineering, Inc.
  • 5,742 posts
  • Version:LabVIEW 2012
  • Since:1993

Posted 31 May 2007 - 08:19 PM

QUOTE(jaegen @ May 31 2007, 02:55 AM)

Now that was a beautifully executed shameless plug!

Absolutely - I was as digusted as you are at Jim's pathetic attempt to push innocent LAVA members toward his book! Maybe he was the original blog author too?

On a completely unrelated topic - check this out:
Posted Image

Image Acquisition and Processing with LabVIEW

Christopher G. Relf V I Engineering, Inc., Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA
Series: Image Processing Series Volume: 5

List Price:
$119.95
Web Price: $107.96
You Save: $11.99

Cat. #: 1480
ISBN: 9780849314803
ISBN 10: 0849314801
Publication Date: 7/28/2003
Number of Pages: 264
Availability: In Stock

post-181-1170858537.png


#7 Eugen Graf

Eugen Graf

    Extremely Active

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 435 posts
  • Location:Germany
  • Version:LabVIEW 8.6
  • Since:2003

Posted 31 May 2007 - 08:59 PM

Here is my meaning to this topic http://forums.lavag....i...ost&p=25729


Eugen

#8 Jim Kring

Jim Kring

    packages everywhere!

  • JKI
  • 1,901 posts
  • Location:Lafayette, CA
  • Version:LabVIEW 2011
  • Since:1995

Posted 31 May 2007 - 11:33 PM

QUOTE(jaegen @ May 30 2007, 09:55 AM)

QUOTE(Jim Kring)

Want to help LabVIEW become more relevant in the computer book market? Why not buy a good LabVIEW book Posted Image

Now that was a beautifully executed shameless plug! :P
Jaegen


Thanks! And, thank you for the extra coverage ;)

#9 neBulus

neBulus

    LV Survivalist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,389 posts
  • Version:LabVIEW 2009
  • Since:2009

Posted 01 June 2007 - 01:50 PM

QUOTE(Jim Kring @ May 30 2007, 06:12 PM)

Now that was a beautifully executed shameless plug! :P
Jaegen


Thanks! And, thank you for the extra coverage ;)


Concidering how LTR fell by the wayside and was replaced by LAVA, and other on-line forums, it appears that it is printed media that is becoming irrelevant .

Ben

Discalimer: Years ago I gave up a living room in favor of a library.

#10 Mike Ashe

Mike Ashe

    The 500 club

  • Premium Member
  • 814 posts

Posted 01 June 2007 - 02:58 PM

QUOTE(crelf @ May 30 2007, 12:32 PM)

Right - basing a language's popularity on book sales is poor science at best, manipulative at worst.

Agreed about popularity, and that is even more true about basing a language's supposed relevance on book sales. Considering how much emphasis is placed on quality control, testing, 6 sigma, etc, today, everything manuafactured is or will be tested to meet regulations and standards for safety, quality, etc. Many of us fly on jetliners regularly, whose components and systems are tested adn certified with LabVIEW, same for our cars, cell phones, the computers we are looking at now, the network components linking us on LAVA, the optical fiber, etc, etc.

I'd say LabVIEW indirectly touches the lives of most people in the Western world almost every day in a positive way. My current project is fuel cell research and testing, which might be relevant to an internationally debated topic or two. :rolleyes: I know lots of others here and in the larger LabVIEW community can state the same with their current and recent projects.

LabVIEW Irrelevant? ROTFLOL !

#11 zoogies

zoogies

    1 more post to go.

  • Members
  • 9 posts

Posted 26 June 2007 - 07:22 PM

Well, I wouldn't call OCAML irrelevant or LaTeX "minor" either...