Jump to content

PaulG.

Members
  • Posts

    822
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    22

Posts posted by PaulG.

  1. Paul,

    I'm not sure what NI told you, but that does not sound correct!!! I have the full development Suite and I had the problem. And, as I stated earlier, I performed the tasks as mentioned, it took less than 5 minutes to do, and the problem went away. I have not experienced any other problem (related to that) since.

    William

    I'm not sure what happened, but I reinstalled LV 8.6.1 and tried the patch again - backing up the "patched" files first wink.gif . The patch installed just fine this time. I have been having some licensing issues since I upgraded to 8.6 last year and I think I got that resolved using a different license number when reinstalling it this morning. This little adventure helped me resolve an issue I've been fighting for over a year. And no loss of productivity, either since most of my Thursday mornings are spent in meetings. thumbup1.gif

  2. i found this bug a few months ago. It was quite annoying at that time fighting with LV to change the limit frusty.gif

    I have 8.6.1, installed this "patch" this morning and it killed my LV software. If customer service can't help me out it looks like I have to do a reinstall. angry.gif

    Update: Just got off with NI. Seems this patch is for the base development system only. I have the Pro. My bad. oops.gif

    I still have to remove and reinstall, though. sad.gif

  3. Quoting myself: Is that acceptable? laugh.gif

    I read this article this morning and though of this post. Paper companies want us to print more!

    I also recently got to experiment with my sister-in-law's iPad. It was actually quite nice. She had downloaded several of the free classic books and they were quite readable. You can view single pages or turn the unit sideways and view two pages at a time. There's a 'lock' at the top of the device to prevent it from matching the orientation of the iPad (vertical or horizontal).

    My 9 year old daughter said "Dad, it's a big iPod touch! Can I get this instead of an iPod for my birthday?"

    I have to give the iPad the nod over the Kindle or Nook; it's more expensive but is a true computing device. I think I would rather have one device over three or more (laptop, ebook, music/vid player and handheld game player).

    Last year it was netbooks; this appears to be the year of the tablet. A dual core Pine Trail Atom tablet with an SSD and a 7" OLED screen will be very nice. You could even run LabVIEW on it!

    An interesting comparison between the iPad and Kindle.

  4. I do not have a "scc system".

    Neither do I. My most recent attempt (out of a couple) was last year trying to get TortoiseSVN to work with just me as the developer. For some reason Subversion refuses to play nice with me and I gave up. I was the only developer and made backups every single day and archived the old ones so it didn't matter, right? Well I've been listening to the LV gods and have decided it still needs to get done. So yesterday I started playing with Mercurial. Today I installed TortoiseHG. Already I've had better luck with this setup than I ever had with SVN. And so just a few hours ago I ceremoniously uninstalled Subversion from my system (laugh.gifYES!laugh.gif )

    Seems like a good time for me since I'm reorganizing and building more reuse libraries. We shall see how it goes. I'm optimistic.

  5. ... I don't use passwords at all ... If a user wants to get in and muck around with the code... that's on them. I can't protect them from their own stupidity.

    Here! Here!

    Passwords. Arghhhh! I hate the damn things.

    I have some code here written by a previous developer. Once in a while I'll stumble upon a vi that can only be opened with a password. And of course, I don't know the password. I have to delete the vi and recreate it the best I can.

    Trust me. Judging by what I can read from this guy he wasn't that clever.

    And I am the crazed psychopath who inherited his code. Fortunately for him I don't know where he lives.

  6. From some books and documents, these two seem don't have much difference, the result of using a Functional Global Variance is the same as that of calling a sub-vi with same function, then why does LabVIEW develop the concept of Functional Global Variance? Is there any good reasons to use the Functional Global Variance instead of a sub-vi?

    Thanks a lot!

    I'm not sure I know what you are talking about. Do you mean "Functional Global Variable"? More info here.

  7. I realize that the other forum members can stand up for themselves, but he *did* post this in the "Help me with this LabVIEW code I want to write" section of the forum, and not the "I've got a small job for a LabVIEW programmer" section. And then proceeded to accept free suggestions. Or rather proceeded to respond negatively to free suggestions. Definitely sending mixed messages.

    We need more women in engineering. wub.gif

  8. Stylistically, I almost never close a passed-in reference in a subVI. I always close it in the same VI that opened/generated it. That way I don't have to worry about a reference that I think is valid actually being invalid because it was closed in a subVI somewhere beforehand.

    -D

    I'm the same way but I think there is more to doing it that way than just "style". I don't think I've ever seen an application where a reference was closed in a subvi. It just doesn't seem to make much sense. To me that would be a good example of code obfuscation.

  9. Try these on for size!

    post-415-127005216553_thumb.png throwpc.gif

    post-415-127005224263_thumb.png

    That little white block on that last one is my 1920x1200 monitor. frusty.gif I'd need about nine of them side by side to see the whole thing.

    At least I don't have to refactor, but try and understand and document that! If it were up to me, it would be rewritten from scratch. That may happen yet at some point.

    Butbutbutbut I thought monitor manufacturers are coming out with wider and wider screens just for us LV guys.

  10. "The biggest scam in history"... I thought the biggest scam in histoty ir religion.

    Some of my more religious and conservative associates think Darwinism is the "biggest scam in history". But that's another thread on another forum, and it's not going to be started by me. rolleyes.gif

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.