Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have a system that composed of

1- NI-cRIO9014

2- Chassis (cRIO-9104)

3- Three Mods. NI9215

 

I use this system to capture 12 analog signals.

What is the relation between sampling frequency defined by time delay in fpga.vi and the Requested number of Elements defined in FIFO?. 

When I use a time delay of 40us and Requested number of Elements 8191, it produces wrong data.

When I use a time delay of 40us and Requested number of Elements 65535, it produces correct data.

Link to post

There are a lot more issues to consider than the ones you listed - in particular, the size of the host-side FIFO buffer, the speed at which you read elements out of the FIFO on the host, and the number of elements you read on the host at a time. What is your host code doing? Show us your code.

 

A DMA FIFO has two buffers: one on the FPGA, and one on the host. For a target-to-host (FPGA to RT) FIFO, the FPGA fills its buffer, and in the background the contents of that buffer are automatically moved to the host buffer periodically or when the buffer is full, whichever happens first, assuming there's room available in the host buffer. (For a host-to-target FIFO, this happens in the other direction - elements are copied out of the host buffer to the FPGA when the FPGA buffer has space available.)

 

If you fill the FIFO buffer faster than you empty it, you'll start losing data. This will probably appear as though the channels are shifted. You can fix this by reading from the FIFO on the host more frequently, or increasing the size of the host buffer and reading more elements at a time.

Link to post

Check the discussion here.  The initial post mentions host->target FIFO, but I mistakenly started a discussion regarding target->host FIFO.  Size of buffers is not addressed, but Ned is correct to bring that up as well as frequency of data transfer.  You should be pulling data frequently enough to need the check I illustrated with the screenshot, otherwise you are likely overflowing the buffer.

Link to post

I'd recommend just using this:

http://www.ni.com/example/31206/en/

It attempts to simplify the problem. 

 

Without derailing too much, I've not found great use for the crio waveform library as my applications aren't this straightforward typically (though I imagine it could be used for this application).  Is there something I'm missing?

Link to post

Probably not, its designed to handle the situation that sometimes came up prior to the RT-cDAQ where you needed a RT processor but didn't care about the FPGA. The goal was to make a simple daqmx-like API for that specific use case.

 

That having been said, its so simple that I've used it as a starting point for any streaming acquisition from the FPGA, for example you could be processing data, and then wanting to stream up the results. So in the acquisition loop instead of reading directly from I/O you could read from a target-scoped fifo or a local register.

 

Its true value to me, now that the RT-cRIO is out, is (a) as a teaching tool, and (b) as a template which reminds me of all the stuff I might need, like having an idle state on the FPGA, acquisition stopping and restarting, checking for timeouts, etc. If you have your own template or pattern you start from, or your projects are different enough that such a tool doesn't make sense, then the reference library doesn't make sense. The page itself also has some great benchmarks for network and disk streaming which i reference regularly.

Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

    • By Ricardo de Abreu
      Hi guys. This semester I'm starting a course system development for control and automation engineering, witch will be based on LabView. Therefore, my University doesn't have a NI hardware, even a MyRIO for us to test our VI and the teacher said that we should test our projects with our own Arduino...
      So, I have a little experience in Arduino and I know the basics for LabView. Now I'm in a point that I know that with Arduino I'll not take the best from LabView. I cannot even deploy a code to it.
      So, there is where my question comes in...
      I'm looking for a new board better then Arduino to use in the classes. I would buy a MyRIO card if I had the money but in Brazil this board is too expensive for me
       Witch one should I get that is closest to myRIO and less expensive than that? I would like to try de deployment of a VI and FPGA..... Is this possible?
      Thanks a lot for the help!
      Regards
    • By grjgrj
      Hello. I need change some code for SbRIO-9626 with LabVIEW 2018. I have code from LabVIEW 2015. Right now I have only LabVIEW 2018. And I worked with it for SbRIO-9627.
      LabVIEW FPGA, LabVIEW Real-Time, NICRIO1800 driver istalled.
      And I install Xilinx ISE 11.5 Compilation Tool too. 
      When I start compilation FPGA VI I got error about problem with compilation too (see attachment picture).
      Could you tell me how I can solve this problem? 
      It is very important. 

    • By prabhakaran
      Hi,
       
       
      I am trying to use image convolution inside FPGA. My Image size is around 6kx2k. The convolution is applied properly until 2600 pixels in x resolution. After that, the values seem to miss previous row data. 
       
      In Detail: As convolution is matrix operation, image data needs to be stored for the operation. But it seems there is an inadvertent error storing only 2600 pixels per row inside FPGA. And hence the filtered output is calculated assuming these pixels to be 0. 
       
      I have tried with different image sizes, different convolution kernels, and also in different targets (cRIO 9030 and IC 3173). All results are same.
       
      I have attached a screenshot of FPGA VI and an example image.
       
      The example image shows an input image of 4000x2500 of same pixel value 16.The kernel is 3x3 of values 1 with divider=1. The RT image is processed using IMAQ convolute inside RT controller and has value 144 [(9*16)/1] for all pixels. But the FPGA processed image (zoomed in) has 144 until 2597 pixels and then 112 (7*16- showing 1 column of 2 rows missing) at 2598, 80 (5*16- showing 2 columns of 2 rows missing) at 2599 and 48 after that (missing 3 columns of 2 rows- current row is always present). This shows the data is missing from the previous rows after 2600 index.
       
      Is there some mistake in the code or any workaround available?


    • By tdavid
      Hi,
      If I generate an FPGA IP core from my LabVIEW code, can I use it somehow in traditional FPGA development environments, such as Vivado?
      Thanks,
      David
    • By Nala
      Hello everybody,

      I'm about to write an application that can create a complete new FPGA-Project for the cRIO-system automatically without any user Input.

      Before I ask my question directly, I will give you a few Information about the system and how it works at the moment.
      I'm working with a cRIO-system that can have different modules in different slots (max 8). That system should be universally usable which means I can replace one module with another one at the start up and create a complete new project with a different name.

      Most of the project works (I can find out in which slots which module is placed and load the right VI's correctly) but there is one point which I really dislike: the user always has to give some input Information at the beginning of the creation and mostly that is the same like "Which type of project it should be" or "Which IP address should be used to find the system and the modules for each slot".

      The goal is that I can write down some specific arguments so the program is created automatically?
      Or - if there is no way to do this - a way that a second window is shown on screen to help the user through the creation process (for example that tells the user that the system need to be turned on that the project can find every single module)?

      English isn't my mother tongue, so please apologize if there are any mistakes in my spelling.
      Thank you very much for your help
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.