Jump to content

37Signals Goes Against Conventional Wisdom in App Design


alukindo

Recommended Posts

Hello LAVA:

The following article has some interesting insights as to why functional spec may not necessarily be critical in designing good applications. 37 Signals are the makers of Basecamp, a simple web based collaboration software that works on the principle that project management is about 'team member communication' rather 'gantt-charting' project execution.

Another article on meetings cautions on why these may sometime be ineffective.

It is quite interesting to see how others feel about these articles.

Anthony L.

Link to comment

Hi Anthony,

First of all QUOTE

They often contain at least one moron that inevitably gets his turn to waste everyone's time with nonsense
We fired him in September.

Seriously, though. My experience with functional specs tends to make me agree with the first article, but specifically with this point: QUOTE

Functional specs only lead to an illusion of agreement

My situation has me building test equipment that must meet a customer-approved ATP, which is written in stone and the basis for a functional spec. The trouble begins when we start to get requests from our internal customer (the Design Engineering group) for features beyond the ATP requirements.

I've seen success with a "Statement of work" - "Statement of understanding" process where the customer writes what they want (the SOW), we read it and respond with our understanding of what they wrote (the SOU). They read our SOU and modify their SOW and we go 'round and 'round until we're sure that we have an understanding (as sure as we can be, anyway).

I can't see how to build test equipment without a good document at the beginning, whether it's called a 'functional spec' or 'requirements document'. I began a thread here looking for help (got some good pointers, too). I'd need to learn to manage the process at the beginning of the project so I can satisfy all my customers (ATE delivered on-time, within budget and slick).

Thanks for the link.

Jim

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.