Poll on Architecture and Frameworks
I was interested in the relative numbers of LAVA developers using different "frameworks" or types of architecture. Apologies, my list of poll options shows my biases towards a message-passing, actor-ish, style of architecture.
Sorry, I seem to have forgotten to allow more than one option, so you'll have to pick the the best answer and explain more in a post.
I pick "Messenger Library", though as I developed that, my honest answer is that I use my own internal framework.
Thought I'd show an example of "complexity" of a framework, according to my way of thinking, by comparing the priority messages of the NI Actor Framework and the DQMH:
Looks the same from an API level (they even use similar icons). Let's look inside; here is the relevant code section for priority messages for the AF:
Yikes! And here is the same for DQMH:
Ah, much simpler. Now we can see which framework involves more complexity: the DQMH.
Wait, what, you s
