Chris Bolin Posted October 1, 2010 Report Share Posted October 1, 2010 I realized that I should have posted this on LAVA months ago... During NIWeek 2010 we launched the new LabVIEW Tools Network, and one of the first products we were able to include was OpenG. Why is this relevant? Well, ideally it will get OpenG out in front of more LabVIEW users and maybe even help the project. Have a great weekend! 1 Quote Link to comment
crelf Posted October 2, 2010 Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 It's absolutely a great idea to get OpenG in front of more people, and OpenG also won the 2010 AddOn of the Year award at NI-Week! Well deserved One quick question: one of the real benefits of packaging reuseable code is so you don't have monolithic reuse libraries, which is how OpenG used to be structured - so why the move to a monolithic distribution? Quote Link to comment
Chris Bolin Posted October 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 Why the move to a monolithic distribution? It's not monolithic! The OpenG package is simply empty, with dependencies on all of the constituent packages. This way, it's very easy to get OpenG for the first time (something that was somewhat awkward before). But you as an OpenG user will not form dependencies on the OpenG package, just the children. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.