Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'windowing'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Software & Hardware Discussions
    • LabVIEW Community Edition
    • LabVIEW General
    • LabVIEW (By Category)
    • Hardware
  • Resources
    • LabVIEW Getting Started
    • GCentral
    • Code Repository (Certified)
    • LAVA Code on LabVIEW Tools Network
    • Code In-Development
    • OpenG
  • Community
    • LAVA Lounge
    • LabVIEW Feedback for NI
    • LabVIEW Ecosystem
  • LAVA Site Related
    • Site Feedback & Support
    • Wiki Help

Categories

  • *Uncertified*
  • LabVIEW Tools Network Certified
  • LabVIEW API
    • VI Scripting
    • JKI Right-Click Framework Plugins
    • Quick Drop Plugins
    • XNodes
  • General
  • User Interface
    • X-Controls
  • LabVIEW IDE
    • Custom Probes
  • LabVIEW OOP
  • Database & File IO
  • Machine Vision & Imaging
  • Remote Control, Monitoring and the Internet
  • Hardware

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Personal Website


Company Website


Twitter Name


LinkedIn Profile


Location


Interests

Found 1 result

  1. A colleague of mine was tasked to create a program which takes as input 1000 data points each second along with two "masks", one for max and one for min, and the program will analyze and report TRUE if there is any section of the 1000 data points that fall perfectly in between the two masks. He wanted to do this in C++ but I told him this type of data analysis stuff sounds like LabVIEW's bread & butter. I browsed some of the Waveform VI's, especially the "Window" pallet but those don't seem to be what I want. I have an algorithm in mind to do this manually in LabVIEW, but id like some expert opinions if there is an easier way to do this with existing VI's before I attempt to remake the wheel; perhaps Open-G has something I can leverage as well? Just to drive home what I'm looking for, below is a visual picture of when the program would report back TRUE. I'm not sure how much this matters but I should mention that the two masks are NOT given as 1000 data points like the pulse to analyze is. Rather, since they are simple step functions they are given with level (V) + duration (ms) pairs. For example one of the masks could be described as: 0.1 250 10.0 500 0.1 250 Which means the pulse is 0.1 volts for 250ms then steps up to 10 volts for 500ms and then finally steps down to 0.1 volts again for the remaining 250ms. Thanks for your help!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.