GTree Posted August 11, 2009 Report Posted August 11, 2009 Hi All, In following project example there are XControl 1 and tester.vi. My target was build flexible display object (XControl 1) because my user interface is varying lot depending current customer configuration. The amount of these XControls are typically 100-200 pieces per display. The problem is that this code structure generates lot CPU load(even it is very simple). This can be seen easily when tester.vi is set to run. Is there any way to decrease CPU load? I have also asked this question from NI discussion forum but I didn't get proper answer. The thread is here: http://forums.ni.com/ni/board/message?board.id=170&thread.id=430097 Xcontrol_performance_test_8_6_v2.zip Quote
BrokenArrow Posted August 13, 2009 Report Posted August 13, 2009 I have also asked this question from NI discussion forum but I didn't get proper answer. I thought DFGray and Ben gave good advice. The only clear "answer" I can think of is "don't do that". Quote
unicorn Posted August 13, 2009 Report Posted August 13, 2009 Do you really need that many indicators? Can they be grouped somehow so that you could show less indicators at the same time and than switch bewteen pages? What are they showing? Does the user/customer has to watch them all at the same time? He can't really observe 100 indicators. Perhaps it is sufficient only to pop up the indicators which show a critical state? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.