Jump to content

Typedefs and Class Design


Recommended Posts

This is a cross-post from the Dark Side - I've searched for a while without finding any definitive discussion on this topic, so please post your thoughts over there.

I have a discussion question about best practices pertaining to typedefs and class design.

Background: In terms of object composition and nested data structures, it appears that Typedefs have been deprecated by classes. I have noticed that typedef'd data members of the Private Class Data Cluster are excluded from the auto-tracked Mutation History (more about Mutation History) of the class. This leads to problems versioning persistent data, and also I have seen IDE mismatches on "Bundle/Unbundle by Name" when accessing class private data after renaming typedef'd data members.

Thus raises the question:

Is it typically a bad idea have typedefs as data members in class private data?

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.