m3nth Posted June 20, 2005 Report Share Posted June 20, 2005 Alright I know there's a way to do it. I've seen it posted before and can't find the old posts now for the life of me. I don't want to just copy my LV2 global and then have to make duplicate changes every time I change something internally during the development process. I remember vaguely something about making the LV2 global re-entrant then using a wrapper for each instance--something like that--seems like you would still have to add controls and indicators to each wrapper if the guts changed though. What's the best way to do this? (Or where are the posts if it's been posted previously?) Link to comment
pmaj Posted June 20, 2005 Report Share Posted June 20, 2005 Hello I think that's what you were writing about: typedef good luck! pmaj Link to comment
m3nth Posted June 21, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 21, 2005 That was indeed a much earlier post on LV2 globals... I re-read that before posting this time though--it does not have the information I'm looking for (unless I missed it the second time skimming through). I now understand LV2 globals and how they function but whenever I have used one I have only needed to use one instance of it. Now the case has arisen where I may want to have two instances of the same global, ie, two different data sets. The painful way to do it would be to make a copy of the LV2 VI and rename it two a second file. As I said though, I'm almost sure I've read a better way to do it... one where the same file can be instantiated or something of the sort, which would not require duplicate changes if the core functionality needed to be updated. Link to comment
Mark Balla Posted June 21, 2005 Report Share Posted June 21, 2005 I now understand LV2 globals and how they function but whenever I have used one I have only needed to use one instance of it. Now the case has arisen where I may want to have two instances of the same global, ie, two different data sets. The painful way to do it would be to make a copy of the LV2 VI and rename it two a second file. As I said though, I'm almost sure I've read a better way to do it... one where the same file can be instantiated or something of the sort, which would not require duplicate changes if the core functionality needed to be updated. 5073[/snapback] The idea of many of the same data sets or Objects is the reason GOOP was created. Try looking into the OpenG Goop. If not how about Instead of one Cluster in your LV2 global why not use an Array of them. Then create a terminal that specifies which element in the array to operate on. Link to comment
mgunning Posted June 23, 2005 Report Share Posted June 23, 2005 What you want to do is make your LV2 global re-entrant (exactly what you don Link to comment
m3nth Posted June 24, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 24, 2005 This is exactly the information I was looking for and couldn't find... Bravo! :thumbup: I should be able to implement based on your instructions. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now