atilla

QUOTE(Aristos Queue @ Feb 14 2008, 06:23 PM) Okay, that makes sense, thanks for the explanation Aristos! atilla

QUOTE(george seifert @ Feb 14 2008, 05:15 PM) Hello George, Thanks for posting your code. I stripped it down and found something strange: The first vi does not have the additional buffer. In the second I only changed the control to a constant, the buffer shows up... Looks like a bug? atilla

QUOTE(george seifert @ Feb 14 2008, 02:45 PM) Hi George, Odd indeed, this code is 8.5 as well. What does your code look like? atilla

Hi all, See the attached images. The first vi with an array of doubles uses ~8 MB as expected. When I add a "Replace Array Subset" an additional buffer is created at the shift register, the used memory is doubled to 16 MB. Is there a way to avoid this? My intention is to replace existing array space, I don't see the need for an additional copy in this case .. The In Place Structure doesn't work here either... This is a cross post: http://forums.ni.com/ni/board/message?boar...=125662#M301485 Thanks in advance atilla