atilla
-
Posts
4 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Gallery
Posts posted by atilla
-
-
QUOTE(george seifert @ Feb 14 2008, 05:15 PM)
Hello George,
Thanks for posting your code. I stripped it down and found something strange:
The first vi does not have the additional buffer. In the second I only changed the control to a constant, the buffer shows up... Looks like a bug?
atilla
-
QUOTE(george seifert @ Feb 14 2008, 02:45 PM)
That's odd. I'm doing something similar (2D array), initializing an array before the loop, sending it to a shift register and replacing array data within the loop. I'm not getting an allocation dot at the shift register. I'm using LV 8.5.George
Hi George,
Odd indeed, this code is 8.5 as well. What does your code look like?
atilla
-
Hi all,
See the attached images.
The first vi with an array of doubles uses ~8 MB as expected. When I add a "Replace Array Subset" an additional buffer is created at the shift register, the used memory is doubled to 16 MB. Is there a way to avoid this? My intention is to replace existing array space, I don't see the need for an additional copy in this case ..
The In Place Structure doesn't work here either...
This is a cross post: http://forums.ni.com/ni/board/message?boar...=125662#M301485
Thanks in advance
atilla
Why does the "Replace Array Subset" double the used memory?
in Application Design & Architecture
Posted
QUOTE(Aristos Queue @ Feb 14 2008, 06:23 PM)
Okay, that makes sense, thanks for the explanation Aristos!
atilla