Jump to content

flarn2006

Members
  • Content Count

    347
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    21

flarn2006 last won the day on March 26 2019

flarn2006 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

92

1 Follower

About flarn2006

  • Rank
    Extremely Active
  • Birthday 07/28/1993

Profile Information

  • Location
    LabVIEW's Attic

Contact Methods

LabVIEW Information

  • Version
    LabVIEW 2020
  • Since
    2005

Recent Profile Visitors

4,776 profile views
  1. Ah right, I forgot about that. Though I swear I remember using a trial version on my Mac at some point back when I used one. I wonder though, do they really need anything elaborate for a license manager? I doubt it would be difficult to put something together from scratch. I guess it wouldn't necessarily be worth the effort for a free product though—hell, I wasn't expecting them to ever give away LabVIEW for noncommercial hobbyist use at all, as much as I hoped they would. I already filled out the Site Feedback form reporting it as a bug, but I guess if nothing else it'll make them a
  2. It specifically says "previous versions" in the message.
  3. It seems to think that LabVIEW 2020 isn't the latest version, saying an SSP subscription is required to download it. My guess is there's a bug where it thinks "2020 Patch" is the latest, even though it requires "2020" in order to install. Still though, it doesn't have Community Edition. But it does make me wonder about something: IIRC the only reason they don't have it available for Linux is because of technical issues with the license manager, rather than any desire to force people to use Windows. So if I were to download a different edition for Linux and crack it to work without a licen
  4. I've tried both NXG and 2020 (both Community Edition) and get the same problem: the "NI Package Manager" window appears, but it's solid black, and just hangs. I know LabVIEW probably wasn't designed with Wine in mind, but is anyone aware of a fix? It would be nice to run it on Linux without all the overhead of a VM.
  5. "Fill in the blank: My favorite thing about #LabVIEW is _____."

    image.png.6b333bc5348f9ee13165c1d2661e5d10.png

  6. I hope so. It would be nice to not have to bother with a VM.
  7. Seeing as you're the admin, is there any way you can set up a redirect? Maybe something on the site where you can paste a URL and have it find the current link?
  8. Isn't there an optional ability VI you can add to an XControl that will modify the state before saving? It says it's specifically for this purpose.
  9. Aww, that's a shame. It would still be nice to get it added to LabVIEW though; then it will be possible to use this framework without adding a big dependency. New data types sound exciting though; are you allowed to say what they are? (A hint at least?)
  10. @X___: I'm curious, how did you make that class wire look like that? I know how to do it; I'm just curious if you used my tool to do it.
  11. I haven't used this toolkit much but I'm using a Windows 7 VM as well and I haven't noticed any issues.
  12. This'll be a feature in the next version. Also wtf, those six characters in the screenshot filename just came from an RNG
  13. In any application where a GPIB connection error is not fatal, there may as well not even be a warning. :p

  14. When I mentioned manually manipulating the resources I was actually thinking something like #3. Well to be more precise, I was picturing my own tool (linked in my signature) that can do the same thing, but NI certainly has their own that they use, that's probably better than mine. (lets hope it leaks :p)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.