>so the question is whether the syntax is worth it?
I understand your core complaint and share it. I'm stilling working on a generalized generic system for LV since typing metadata is technically exposed from variants themselves it *should* be possible, the problem is I don't know an easy way to do this without writing a polymorphic VI that covers _all_ LV types, which would be exhausting.
Really this is a question for each individual not myself. I enjoying using this, I find it greatly reduces what I have to think about when working on arrays. The idea of just writing a single function, and testing that out makes life a bit easier then writing to write out a long chain of for loops, or nesting 5-6 case statements deep (which I see a lot in LV codes bases).
The other suggestions will likely be done. I didn't know what the community considers _normal_ for example placement. It seemed logical to include the example with the class.