Jump to content

valarauca

Members
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

LabVIEW Information

  • Version
    LabVIEW 2012
  • Since
    2008

valarauca's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

0

Reputation

  1. >so the question is whether the syntax is worth it? I understand your core complaint and share it. I'm stilling working on a generalized generic system for LV since typing metadata is technically exposed from variants themselves it *should* be possible, the problem is I don't know an easy way to do this without writing a polymorphic VI that covers _all_ LV types, which would be exhausting. Really this is a question for each individual not myself. I enjoying using this, I find it greatly reduces what I have to think about when working on arrays. The idea of just writing a single function, and testing that out makes life a bit easier then writing to write out a long chain of for loops, or nesting 5-6 case statements deep (which I see a lot in LV codes bases). The other suggestions will likely be done. I didn't know what the community considers _normal_ for example placement. It seemed logical to include the example with the class.
  2. Attached is a very basic Lazy List implementation in Labview. It also includes a very basic Option type (on which it requires). The general idea with Lazy Lists is their contains functions are not called until consumed. This permits programmers to build massively recursive and infinite data structures. It also means if you do 15+20 operations on a list, but only inspect 4-5 elements out of say 1,000,000 then only those 4-5 elements are processed. I'm likely adding on more functionality as time goes on. If your interested let me know. https://github.com/valarauca/LLL
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.