Jump to content

adam85

Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

adam85's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

0

Reputation

  1. Are you sure? I don't think that the Parse Arithmetic Expressions.vi in the strings library uses recursion...it looks for the first ")" and then looks backwards till it finds a "(", and then simplifies the expression and keeps doing it (in a loop). By all means correct me if i'm wrong, again I just bring this up because coincidentally I was looking at that VI recently and that's what it SEEMED to do to me. Adam
  2. Got that working, it's a much better way of doing it, thanks very much! (why didn't I think of this myself ) Adam
  3. OK another question, this one is probably also really easy to answer, but for some reason I can't figure it out. In the picture below you can see that i'm getting data from the serial port and building an array with said data. I want to do other things with this array (I have another case structure connected to a different button, that I want to write this array to an Excel file with). But since the array "exists" within the True case of the structure below, as soon as the button goes off again we're in the False case where i'm forced to wire an empty array, which the rest of the program effectively sees all the time. How do I fix this? Thanks. EDIT: Creating a Local Variable in the False case linked to the array in the True case and wiring it to the output, works. Is there a better/more widely accepted practice?
  4. Thanks, this works - I thought it wasn't possible at first but all I had to do was right click and change the property node to a Write one. I feel smart. Thanks again for the help.
  5. Alright, now I have a slightly new problem. I have an intensity graph, and I want to dynamically change the "Amplitude" or "Z Axis" or "Height" scaling. To be more clear, I want to be able to ignore all data points above a certain height for example (which I can figure out on my own) according to say a slider, and as the slider moves it also adjusts the intensity graph's "Amplitude" scaling so that the remaining data points appear in good contrast with each other. This was my idea for how to "zoom in" and isolate the areas that don't have as large bumps...any better way of doing this, and if not, how would you guys approach this? Thanks, Adam
  6. Hi, I basically want to create a model of a 3D surface, with a 2D graph. I have the xy placement and I represent the height of any given point by its colour (maybe white is the lowest point, gradually going up to red, the highest point on the actual surface). So I want the graph to look like a bunch of points (a probe is going to pass along the surface and take these height measurements), where a bump on the surface would be indicated by the points gradually changing colour and gradually changing back as the probe moves off the bump. I've looked at all the packaged graphing examples included with LabVIEW and nothing seems close enough to help. Any other suggestions as to a BETTER way of representing this data are very welcome as well. I am at the stage where I can put the points wherever I want, but I have no clue how to change the colour. Thanks to all in advance, Adam EDIT: I am very new to LabVIEW, just to clarify. EDIT AGAIN: I'm looking into intensity graphs now...maybe I should have looked at them harder before, sorry guys.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.