Jump to content

cubnstyl

Members
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

cubnstyl's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

0

Reputation

  1. Thank You very much. I made those changes according to the dual waveform sample but I still get 1.5 seconds for ETH and .1-.3 seconds for GPIB. I think you are right, the ETH functionability may not be designed for performance.
  2. Hi all, I have a Tektronix 3054 Oscilliscope connected to a PXI chasis running Windows XP. I have the scope hooked up on both ethernet (with a eth switch) and GPIB. I am trying to design a VI that displays the time it takes to acquire a waveform through ethernet and then GPIB. I have created a very basic VI that has a ms timer at the start of data flow and another one at the end of the acquisition loop for the chosen interface. The logic of this makes sense to me except the GPIB timer reads about 150 ms and the Ethernet timer reads 1.0 s + . This is obviously not right being that Eth is supposed to be faster. I think my design may be too simplistic. CAN I GET SOME HELP PLEASE! I have experience in Java and other object orientated languages, but I am obviously a LABVIEW newbie. HERE IS THE VI Download File:post-5462-1151699165.vi
  3. Thank you, the adjustment does make the program run smoother but I still have a 1.5 second count for ethernet and a much lower count for GPIB. I am going to post this in the proper category so maybe i can get some more help.
  4. Here is the VI with the 2nd loop cased out. The VISA interface is now a control on the front panel. Download File:post-5462-1151691773.vi
  5. Hi all, I have a Tektronix 3054 Oscilliscope connected to a PXI chasis running Windows XP. I have the scope hooked up on both ethernet (with a eth switch) and GPIB. I am trying to design a VI that displays the time it takes to acquire a waveform through ethernet and then GPIB. I have created a very basic VI that has a ms timer at the start of data flow and another one at the end of the acquisition loop for each interface. The logic of this makes sense to me except the GPIB timer reads about 150 ms and the Ethernet timer reads 1.0 s + . This is obviously not right being that Eth is supposed to be faster. I think my design may be too simplistic. The VI has two while loops with stop buttons. The first loop establishes a VISA session through IP and uses an event loop timeout to send a waveform to a graph. The timers are obviosly within the data flow of this event loop. Once the IP whileloop breaks, the second identical loop starts after a new Visa initiation (the IP is closed after the IP loop) with GPIB interface. CAN I GET SOME HELP PLEASE! I have experience in Java and other object orientated languages, but I am obviously a LABVIEW newbie.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.