QUOTE (b2000 @ Mar 17 2008, 06:16 AM)
Hi b200,
Can you explain more about your project overall? I assume the 72ch LVDS is just a small portion of your overall project (or what could become your overall project in the future), and typically see this used for semiconductor or auto (ECU) testing. From my experience, (in a decently unbiased opinion...you are on the LAVA forums ) if you are looking for low cost, simple use case, Geotest may be better initially. Having said that, advantages of NI: TCLK (pico-second synchronization using TCLK w/ HSDIO boards (6561), PXI architechture and fluent integration with any other / future NI products you may be thinking about using, amazing field support and application engineering support when you have problems (problems = lost $, so having good support can prove worthwhile when you get in a bind). Lastly, ni has tons of webcasts and material on their website to help you get started & learn to program w/ HSDIO (driver for 6561) and LabVIEW. I can't really comment on the good/bads of geotest or their programming style or environments.
Hope this helps!
