Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'flexmotion'.
Found 2 results
-
Hi, I found the code snippet I attached in a Flexmotion VI and it checks for counter overflow by subtracting the two unsigned long timestamp values and testing whether the result is <0. Now I've tried a similar construct at my machine and it behaves just as expected: The 32 bit counter rolls over as it should but since we are testing an unsigned value to be <0 the test never gives result "true". Since the code in the "false" branch simply uses the result of the subtraction that should not be a practicat problem but I am wondering whether there is some clever trick behind that or if that is just the useless. Cheers, flintstone By the way: Sorry for the double "just" and for the (succeeded) experiment whether one can rate the own topic.
-
Hi, does anyone know about this problem: http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/5C8FBCA58E07BB208625767E005429D7 ? We have code here that was done with a development system patched as described in the article, the consequence is of course, that we now have to patch each development system where we want to build this. On the other hand if I just replace the VIs concerned on my unpatched system with the original ones the application can be built, so I do not see an error here. Nevertheless the VI names still contain the forbidden "/". Is this a fixed issue? Best regards flintstone
