Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'ini'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Software & Hardware Discussions
    • LabVIEW Community Edition
    • LabVIEW General
    • LabVIEW (By Category)
    • Hardware
  • Resources
    • LabVIEW Getting Started
    • GCentral
    • Code Repository (Certified)
    • LAVA Code on LabVIEW Tools Network
    • Code In-Development
    • OpenG
  • Community
    • LAVA Lounge
    • LabVIEW Feedback for NI
    • LabVIEW Ecosystem
  • LAVA Site Related
    • Site Feedback & Support
    • Wiki Help

Categories

  • *Uncertified*
  • LabVIEW Tools Network Certified
  • LabVIEW API
    • VI Scripting
    • JKI Right-Click Framework Plugins
    • Quick Drop Plugins
    • XNodes
  • General
  • User Interface
    • X-Controls
  • LabVIEW IDE
    • Custom Probes
  • LabVIEW OOP
  • Database & File IO
  • Machine Vision & Imaging
  • Remote Control, Monitoring and the Internet
  • Hardware

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Personal Website


Company Website


Twitter Name


LinkedIn Profile


Facebook Page


Location


Interests

Found 2 results

  1. "Write INI Cluster__ogtk.vi" is rounding numbers in several 1D arrays buried in my super cluster. I am using Producer-Consumer with Supercluster archtecture, so my SC is somewhat deep. The numbers being affected are doubles within arrays within a cluster within a cluster within an array within the Supercluster. I created a work-around in the attached vi with standard NI config file libs. My desire was to have Scientific notation with 7 significant digits. The number was 2.002252E-3. The JKI routine converted this into 0.002002 and dropped 3 digits that were significant parts of a cali
  2. What am I doing wrong? I'm using the JKI "Write INI Cluster__ogtk.vi" and "Read INI Cluster__ogkt.vi" and I can't read back what I wrote. First I "Set" and then "Get". When the "Get" state pushes to the "Variant to Data" I get an error 91 (variant doesn't match type input). Is my cluster too complex? Noticing that the type variant being written doesn't match the variant data being read. It's missing section names. Can I do any complexity cluster or must it be formatted in a specific manner? I saved the hierarchy in this zip so you can see the very JKI libs I'm using. JKI Cluster to INI is
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.