Jump to content

Merge Vs Locking in LabVIEW


Recommended Posts

Any advice or experiences would be a great help.

We tried using the merge paradigm for a while before switching back to locking. There are a couple problems with using scc branch and merge patterns:

  • Labview frequently recompiles the VIs during development, even if you haven't changed that particular VI. If you and another person both make changes to different VIs, but each of those changes causes a third VI to recompile, you have to go through the merge process even though nothing has changed from the developer's perspective. That "third VI" sometimes become those "third through thirtieth VIs," and gets very tiring repeatedly going through a bunch of VI that haven't changed.
  • Labview's merge and diff functions work okay for individual VIs, but they don't work at all for .lvproj, .lvlib, or .lvclass files. The lack of .lvclass support is a real killer for us. If I end up with a check in conflict with a .lvclass file, the best thing to do is close the project, get latest, reopen the project, and recreate all my changes. (Yes, sometimes that's a lot of work that gets thrown away.) There's simply no good way to merge any of those file types and given the way Labview works they change very often.

I like the idea of branch and merge, but in practice it just doesn't work very well in Labview.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.