Jump to content

Community scope "unfriendly" to password protection -- bad design decision?


Recommended Posts

I've managed to keep Community scope by avoiding the password-protection features of VIPM, which is otherwise responsible for damaging the library (Known issue 13790).

I now perform my own project cloning and password protection through a bit of scripting, and leave VIPM to just apply the license file. I really don't think I can live without Community scope in my toolkit, so this workaround will have to do  :blink:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.