Jump to content

Rough Order of Magnitude?


amw253

Recommended Posts

I find myself revisiting a suite of C programs I originally wrote over a decade ago :!: with a view to converting them to LabVIEW. The suite uses impromptu TCP/IP-based data flows between functions, allowing for components to be tested and added in parallel, including remote monitoring and control. I've spent some signficant time looking into the capabilities of LabVIEW and have come to believe that an overall redesign isn't required, mostly just a re-implementation (the exception is the X11 graphics - most of which will quickly collapse into a standard LabVIEW front panel).

Now the hard stuff...

I know how many lines of C code there are in the common libraries and individual modules, and I'm familiar with the workings of the original program. I'd appreciate some insight on the following:

:question: Is there a known ratio of C complexity to LabVIEW complexity? Perhaps C lines of code to LabVIEW "Nodes"?

:question: Is there a typical "productivity" rate for LabVIEW programming - excluding design time?

:question: What other metrics should I look at to determine an estimate of time required?

I'd like to assume that the LabVIEW coding will be of the same standard as the original C coding, and coding includes testing, debugging, documentation, etc..

Thanks in advance,

Andrew

Link to comment

This may not be exactly what you are looking for, but is (hopefully) good info' in general:

Benchmark Execution Speed of LabVIEW Applications

It has the following quote, for instance: "... 3 to 10 times reduction in development time you benefit from when you develop applications in LabVIEW..."

I personally have developed both in C/C++ and LabVIEW and agree with the above statement, especially when it comes to measurement and automation systems.

Regards,

-Khalid

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.