Jump to content

bug in search array?


Recommended Posts

This is 7.1.1.

I've created an array of clusters of doubles, each double having exactly the same properties. For each cluster in the array, I do some simple math, and create an intermediate 1D array of doubles containing the same number of elements as the total number of doubles present in the original array of clusters. I then repeatedly search the array to remove duplicates using the remove duplicates vi from OpenG (here I simply placed the code in line for ease of readability). Then I sort that output array.

In one case I've found that a duplicate is not being removed. Specifically the value 0.3. But it is slightly more complex than that becuase some of them are being removed. Out of 4 instances of that value, I am left with 2 instances. What seems truly strange is when I run on higlight execution, it becomes evident that the ones being removed have a specific pattern or relation to which is found when the search array primitive is called....

In the intermediate array it appears that elements 3 and 5 are related, and elements 6 and 8 are related, as far as the search array primitive is concerned. I.e. during the iteration during which we search for the 5th element, the search primitive finds its element as related to where the 3rd element was placed. Yet the iteration for the 6th element finds nothing, and the 8th element is given the search primtive element relating to the 6th element. I noticed that those pairs are related to that simple math I did to create the intermediate array. Elements 3 and 5 were arrived at through addition. Elements 6 and 8 were simply moved straight through.

So I decided to change the values in my original array that led to values of 0.3 in the intermediate array, and everything worked as it should. So it seems to be, at first glance, something to do with that particular value, and the different ways that value is arrived at, that the search primitive does not see as being the same.

Anyone see something I am missing? Any one see anything like this before? Anyone have an alternative solution? etc...

thanks

James

Download File:post-8730-1199418756.vi

Oops I forgot to include the data that I'm using.

Array 1

.1 .2 .3

.1 .1 .1

.2 .3 .2

.1 .1 .2

Array 2

.1 .2 .5

.1 .3 .1

.2 .5 .2

.3 .1 .2

In addition I've found that adding 0 does not produce this result.

Array 3

.3 .3 .3

0 0 0

.1 .1 .1

.2 .2 .2

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.