Jump to content

Jim Kring

Members
  • Posts

    3,905
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    34

Posts posted by Jim Kring

  1. Has anybody used StarTeam with LabVIEW?

    What I'm really wondering about is does it handle LabVIEW's file format better than MS VSS. Our company is considering switching from VSS to something else and StarTeam is the leading candidate because our biggest customer uses it.

    Thanks

    Ed

    Now's a great time to try to convince them to use subversion ;)

    Anything's better than VSS (not always, but you know what I mean).

  2. In Germany they came first for the Communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't

    Communist.

    Then they came for the Jews and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.

    Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade

    unionist.

    They they came for the Catholics and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant.

    Then they came for me, and by that time there was no one left to speak up.

    Martin Niemoeller

    I am invoking Godwin's Law. This topic is now closed. Sorry, alpha, you lose again.

  3. The dummy people working for the government in any country don't write books; they are stupid.

    Because I wrote a book and I need a Book publishing support; because the dummies from the Canadian government didn't write books they don't know if it is such program.

    What about the law books?

  4. I started out with NI's GOOP, have used Endevo's on a customer rework project which originally used Endevo. Did a bit of the "roll your own" on a couple of projects.

    If there is any way to allow the GOOP poll to use multiple check boxes rather than radio buttons I think it would give a more accurate picture of the GOOP useage.

    Overall, my GOOP use has been fairly light in the past, but I expect it to increase significantly this year.

    My guess is that it will increase around August ;)

  5. Since I was addressed directly, I will respond. I had no knowledge of this and I am extremely upset. Michael must take us for a bunch of fools, if he thinks we are going to sit back and let this happen. I have notified my attorney, to better understand our rights and the implications of Michael's decision -- I will let you all know, as soon as I hear back.

  6. If you mouse down on a multi-column listbox column header and move the mouse slightly, while keeping it within the bounds of the column headers, it will cause the listbox vertical scrollbar to scroll up. Presumably this behavior is intended for selecting a row and dragging it up, above the upper-most row; in which case, you would definitely want this behavrior. I believe that the fix, is to filter this behavior if the user mouses down in the column header, rather than a (data) row of the listbox.

    <OBJECT CLASSID="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" WIDTH="212" HEIGHT="168" CODEBASE="http://active.macromedia.com/flash5/cabs/swflash.cab#version=5,0,0,0"> <PARAM NAME=movie VALUE="scroll_bug.swf"> <PARAM NAME=play VALUE=true> <PARAM NAME=loop VALUE=false> <PARAM NAME=quality VALUE=low> <EMBED SRC="http://forums.lavag.org/index.php?act=Attach&type=post&id=2498" WIDTH=212 HEIGHT=168 quality=low loop=false TYPE="application/x-shockwave-flash" PLUGINSPAGE="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"> </EMBED> </OBJECT>

    Test VI:

    Download File:post-17-1143588737.vi

    Status: Filed with R&D

    CAR#: 3VSACUV2

    Download File:post-17-1143588422.swf

  7. just to bring up the thread again ...

    has noone else yet experienced this behaviour? has noone a tip for me?

    :sob:

    LabVIEW 8.0 stores palette edits in the LabVIEW Data folder (usually found in My Documents). Try looking in there -- you might want to delete all of this palette data.

  8. I just checked at Amazon, and they have it posted, so let me also plug:

    LabVIEW for Everyone : Graphical Programming Made Easy and Fun (3rd Edition) (Hardcover)

    By Jeffrey Travis and Jim Kring

    The cat's out of the bag now, thank you! I hate keeping secrets (being a pretty "open" guy).

    Let me just say that I am very excited about this book (please, pardon my intrinsic biases). Jeffrey and I started out on the very solid foundation provided by the 1st and 2nd editions, we had a truly amazing team of technical reviewers, and LabVIEW (especially 8.0) is a truly great product that's full of amazing features (and, most of us have not even scratched the surface).

    Yes, Jeffrey is the fellow that planted the open source seed (for me at least) -- here is a link, were you can read up on the history of OpenG. I was very honored to be asked, by Jeffrey, to co-author the 3rd edition.

    Lastly, some weight has definitely been added to this book, as it has gotten quite a bit thicker ;)

    Cheers,

  9. Colin,

    Welcome to LAVA :)

    My favorite part about LAVA is that it is independent. It is not censured (NI can delete your postings for arbitrary non-disclosed reasons on the NI forums). I also like LAVA because contributions are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License -- but, if I post on the NI forums, then NI has the right to (re)use my posting for whatever purposes they see fit (including possible marketing material), per the Terms of Use of the NI forums. I also like LAVA because it is a community created by LabVIEW users, for LabVIEW users -- it is community effort and participation at its best.

    Cheers,

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.