crelf

QUOTE (Michael Aivaliotis @ Mar 11 2009, 06:41 PM)

I remember watching this back in the 70s as a kid.

Me too! I saw it on TV, and my mother was a little concerned that I would be upset by it (I was a wee one back then) - instead I proclaimed it the funniest thing I'd ever seen (hey - I was 5!) I have no idea why it popped into my head yesterday.

QUOTE (Maca @ Mar 12 2009, 09:43 AM)

I am omnipotent.

QUOTE (TobyD @ Mar 12 2009, 10:06 AM)

"getting up someone" is refers to getting up in someone's face (angry), or more commonly http://forum.wordreference.com/showpost.php?p=2526109&postcount=2' rel='nofollow' target="_blank">getting the wind up them (scaring them). Although, I'm sure it could mean many different things - I'm not sure how close Maca is with his boss

Screenshots are good for us to get an idea of what's in the code, but I like it when members actually upload the code so I can play around with it, see what's really happening, test changes, make suggestions more easily, etc. It would be great if there was a board plug-in that could show a web-preview of the diagram of uploaded VIs...

QUOTE (Mark Yedinak @ Mar 11 2009, 08:56 PM)

I have been trying to roll my own but so far the images aren't displaying correctly. It appears that I am doing decode of the RLE data correctly but the image definitely is not being displayed correctly.

Can you upload what you've tried (including an example PCX file)?

QUOTE (bmoyer @ Mar 11 2009, 03:34 PM)

Wikipedia also gives a very good description of the file format: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCX

If you want to go down that route (it should be pretty straightforward to implement), this might help:

QUOTE (Antoine Châlons @ Mar 11 2009, 03:27 AM)

Very nice! I liked the DVD rip example in particular

QUOTE (neBulus @ Mar 10 2009, 05:45 AM)

Exactly.

Have you reported it to NI? If so, do you have a CAR#?

QUOTE (bsvingen @ Mar 6 2009, 02:20 AM)

I'm not sure about the null-wire though, basically because I think adding yet another wire that doesn't really do anything, is IMO a step in the wrong direction.

...but it does - it forces execution order.

QUOTE (bsvingen @ Mar 6 2009, 02:20 AM)

I don't think anyone's suggesting that current methods (like a sequence structure border) go away. Personally, I like to link up error clusters for the error handling and because it gives me a convienient method forcing of flow. I like the idea of a null wire because it allows me to force flow. Sure, there are other ways to do it, but that doesn't mean that this idea is wrong. In fact, I'd hope that the implementation of the null wire would act just like putting seqeunce structures areound stuff - maybe that's what could actually happen in th back ground. A first step could be a null wire that only worked between seqeuence structures - then we could have the flow without the data (although, we'd need to be able to define the source end of the wire).

QUOTE (neBulus @ Mar 9 2009, 02:42 PM)

That's 43M...

...of memory released - your end amount is less than your start amount. Or is that the amount of free memory?

QUOTE (Val Brown @ Mar 7 2009, 03:00 PM)

Either too many margaritas or not enough. I'll have to experiment a bit more to find out which.

I'll drink to that! :beer:

QUOTE (Val Brown @ Mar 7 2009, 02:29 PM)

I drop a subpanel container on the FP and try to remove the frame.

Right click -> Visible Items -> Frame.

QUOTE (crelf @ Feb 20 2009, 12:25 PM)

In the US? If you're looking for a break away for a while, QANTAS has got a pretty bloody good special for vacations...

OK - now they're getting ridiculous - LA to Brisbane, Sydney or Melbourne for $US675. Don't live in LA? Click here for specials from other airports.

I *think* I know what you're asking, but can you please upload a little example of what you're acheived? I'm not asking for you to upload you app - just an example of the things that are pertinent to the question.

QUOTE (student11 @ Mar 7 2009, 12:45 AM)

I know what Uninitialized means but it seems there was a spelling mistake.

Burn!

QUOTE (neBulus @ Mar 6 2009, 02:12 PM)

I'll leave this running over the week-end because I really don't like talking bad about LV if I don't have to.

Me either. Although this might skew the results, can you log the available memory while you're doing this? (assuming there are no issues with the logging code )

QUOTE (neBulus @ Mar 6 2009, 02:12 PM)

I never said the leak rate was high. ...even a slow leak is of concern to me.

A leak is a leak, and if we loose 1kb every time we open/close then that needs to be fixed.

QUOTE (neBulus @ Mar 6 2009, 11:51 AM)

When last i looked there where about 1K bytes allocated for every opean which were NOT released until after LV shutdown for every open opeation.

Can someone from NI confirm or deny this memory leak? Ben - have you reported it to NI?

I think a null wire is a great idea.

QUOTE (dblk22vball @ Mar 5 2009, 10:36 AM)

I could have the computers update nightly, but if we need to change a parameter during the day, this will not work.

Can't you make them update more often than that? Or you caould have them read the table directly from the network.

QUOTE (jgcode @ Mar 4 2009, 12:08 AM)

As part of working for an NI Alliance member I attended an NI presentation today. I was introduced to a new catch-phrase that I had not heard before - Instrumentation 2.0.

AFAIK, "Instrumentation 2.0" is simply the test-centric description of http://www.viengineering.com/vista_solutions/configMgmt/default_eim.aspx' rel='nofollow' target="_blank">Engineering Information Management (EIM).

QUOTE (Darren @ Mar 4 2009, 11:23 AM)

We use Zs here.

More importantly, do you pronounce them "zees" or "zeds"?

QUOTE (rkesmodel @ Mar 4 2009, 12:34 PM)

We could then search for previuos wishes at top level or within levels and VOTE on them. This would save typing in previously submitted wishes and give an easy tally of how many would like the feature.

Something like Dell's http://www.ideastorm.com/' rel='nofollow' target="_blank">Ideastorm? If that's something you'd like, definately let NI know! :ninja:

QUOTE (Cat @ Mar 4 2009, 06:54 AM)

Well, yes, then it took another 10 minutes attempting to describe what a "crelf" is.

Ha! I actually LOLed My wife has long since given up trying to explain what I am

QUOTE (neBulus @ Mar 4 2009, 08:57 AM)

*sniff* that's, that's beautiful Ben! *sniff*

QUOTE (Daklu @ Mar 3 2009, 04:55 PM)

Well not anymore... :laugh: I could have at the time though. Why?

It's the "[4] error out" that's the key - that was the window title of your fourth probe, and it was probing an error wire. I'd say that there was something that crapped itself in there that required LabVIEw to reset it.

QUOTE (Daklu @ Mar 3 2009, 04:06 PM)

http://lavag.org/old_files/monthly_03_2009/post-7603-1236114009.png' target="_blank">

Did you have a probe on an error cluster?

We've got everything you need - satisfaction gaurenteed.