Jump to content

jakaom

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

jakaom's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

0

Reputation

  1. I tried that just by wiring the output of "Open Application Instance" without anything wired into that function, but this didn't help. Also, NI replied with this being the issue: as of LabVIEW 8.20, VIs in an executable can no longer be programmatically controlled from outside of the executable. In addition, developers can no longer build LabVIEW executables and use them as VI libraries. This means that you can no longer rename an exe to a .llb and gain access to the VI. The reason why this behavior changed wasn't for this security issue, but for compatibility with the upcoming Windows Vista. Meaning that they changed how one can access VI's from inside .exe's. Are they mixed up? Do I just need to give it a different application reference? If what they said is true, any opinion on the best way for me to call VI's from an executable on a run-time system? (I deploy to machines that don't have the LabVIEW development system installed). Do I need to place a .llb instead of the .exe on the machine, and call the VI that's inside the .llb with VI server? Or is there a better way to achieve this? The goal is to have a core executable that never has to change that calls VI's dynamically. That way you can deploy new VI's on a run-time system without have to rebuild the entire application. Thanks!! Jason
  2. In 8.20 I'm seeing an issue with doing what's contained in this link: http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/websearch...F5?OpenDocument It just returns: Error 7 occurred at Open VI Reference when the VI contained in the .exe is called dynamically. But the code runs perfectly in 8.0.1 Any ideas? Thanks!
  3. From what I can tell they've implemented some watered down form of GOOP that doesn't allow you to create multiple objects in the class. Not even clear how they are protecting attributes while they are being modified. On the other hand it looks like they have inheritance. Looks like a useful tool, but different from the GOOP I'm used to.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.