-
Posts
367 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
jpdrolet last won the day on December 2 2012
jpdrolet had the most liked content!
Profile Information
-
Gender
Not Telling
LabVIEW Information
-
Version
LabVIEW 2009
-
Since
2009
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
jpdrolet's Achievements
Newbie (1/14)
2
Reputation
-
I will use the VI BuildTargetBuildSpecification.vi to programmatically build a project but I first need to set some buildspec properties such as the destination folder and version number. Are there VIs or properties I can use for this? I looked into the Properties and AppBuilder folder and I did not figured anything useful. The only solution for the moment is to edit the project file (XML). Any better ideas?
-
QUOTE (JodyK @ May 20 2009, 11:37 AM) Indeed BSD is an Open Source licence. Redistribution of derived work doesn't require to include the source but the licensed code should definitely be available.
-
QUOTE (JodyK @ May 19 2009, 07:15 PM) OpenG INI tools are wrapped around vi.lib's Config File VIs. The latter are the real problem for performance on large INI files. Optimizing OpenG INI VIs (like replacing recursion with a stack) would only marginally improve the performance on large INI files. Just try to replace Config Data Registry.vi (the core of Config File VIs) with a do nothing VI and you'll see that the remaining code (OpenG) takes only a smal fraction of the execution time. I have not used MGI VIs but did take a look at the code. When operating on a file, it only parses the specified section of entries. There is a feature to pay attention for: when writing in a section, the whole section is erased and rewritten so previous existing keys that are not specifically rewritten in the current operation are lost. That allows great speed improvements and the only inconvenience is that you have to structure your data so that you don't write different pieces of data in the same section in multiple write operations.
-
'AND' of an empty boolean array is TRUE?
jpdrolet replied to Justin Goeres's topic in LabVIEW General
Another justification: -
QUOTE (Cat @ May 6 2009, 09:40 AM) I did see it at the theater too. However I had to drive 20min because it was not scheduled in theaters in my city... Any clone made of Picard's hair is doomed to fail anyway... Janeway's hair on the other hand...
-
'AND' of an empty boolean array is TRUE?
jpdrolet replied to Justin Goeres's topic in LabVIEW General
QUOTE (normandinf @ May 6 2009, 11:42 AM) Why the thumb up? 0! is factorial 0 not !0 (logic complement) -
'AND' of an empty boolean array is TRUE?
jpdrolet replied to Justin Goeres's topic in LabVIEW General
QUOTE (David Wisti @ May 6 2009, 11:37 AM) And Multiply Array Elements returns 1 for empty arrays for the same reason as x^0==1 and 0!==1. No elements to operate => return neutral element for that operation. -
QUOTE (FLAnatic @ Apr 24 2009, 09:21 AM) That's a broad statement. I'd say 97.7% of them...
-
QUOTE (newTOlabview @ Apr 30 2009, 08:51 AM) File>Edit VI Library... Maybe? I also have File Manager.vi under the Project menu but I don't remember if it is native to LabVIEW
-
Plugin architecture as exe in 7.1.
jpdrolet replied to Black Pearl's topic in Application Design & Architecture
QUOTE (Black Pearl @ Apr 29 2009, 07:48 AM) That is the expected behavior when opening a VI with VI Server; you have to manage the FP opening explicitely. About the compatibility issue between LabVIEW versions, whether you use exe or dll, you can't open a VI reference to a VI having a different version in your application instance. However, you can have an executable (7.1) running for example the 7.1 plugins and another 8.6 application invoking them opening first an application reference with the VI Server. -
Remote Debug with custom menus
jpdrolet replied to Mark Balla's topic in Development Environment (IDE)
QUOTE (Ton @ Apr 13 2009, 01:02 PM) Did you try that? The debugged application is running in a Run-Time environment, where the BDWin.Open property is not supported. -
Getting rid of the ini
jpdrolet replied to Cat's topic in Application Builder, Installers and code distribution
QUOTE (asbo @ Apr 14 2009, 02:02 PM) I didn't dare to put a unix path on a windows command line.... Ironically, using -pref /dev/null the application still creates the ini file.