V_T_S

The drawback is the base deployment fee per seat. Other than that execution engine, database logging, report generation, user authentication are very useful features and saves lot of development time.

Does your code need to respond to user interface? Does your code has series of steps/defined sequence? Then "YES", state machines are the way to go.

You need to set the array boundary for 2D Array Attached Sequence File.. Test Sequence.seq

Cross - post from NI Forums: http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/Images-in-Multicolumn-Listbox-doesn-t-work-as-expected/td-p/2011249

Nope, Adding an empty image will add one extra element in the multi column list box. This is not what I am looking for.

In the attached example, the symbols are getting displayed in the correct order but missing the symbol for the first row. I can manually select the symbol but by default only the 2nd symbol from the provided array list appear. Any idea what's the issue? How to display correct symbol? Thanks in advance. Images & Multicolumn ListBox.vi

By getting LabVIEW to address more memory, the EXE is now working. Thanks Tomi

I have already gone thru the process of build the EXE using small components, and I also have debugging enabled. I think trying the same build with LabVIEW 2011 seems to be a better approach.

I agree there is not much information. There is no log because this error is displayed before the application initialize the Log. BTW the EXE is a mix of LabVIEW and TestStand calls.

Development Environment works fine, EXE is build successfully but, running the EXE display's the following error: Any idea what is this?

I learned something new today; there is so much to learn in LVOOPs. Thank you.

Has anyone come across the Object color changed (thick black border) automatically? Initial when the code was written the color of the Class Object was like Image 1 Code was working like perfect world. A new issue was discovered and while debugging the code, I noticed the color of my class object has changed from Image 1 to Image 2. FYI, the class library is not locked and this is the Indicator

For the time being I am going with Norm’s suggestion (business decision )just because it an easy fix for me. After reading the link sent by jgcode, I completely agree that some architectural change is required in my code. Thank you for that additionalinformation. Regards,

There “Is A?” relation in the design, this is just a dummy example I made for the submission. It is one of the scenarios where everything works perfect but the one application need little twist/change in the standard code and rather than rewriting/redesigning/duplicating I was looking for some solution. I like the idea of Norm, instead of making a massive change I can selectively call the required method. Thanks everyone.

Call Parent VI – Does not work at application level. It works only when used in the child class methods. Creating static and dynamic VI’s of the same code is a duplication of code. I was hoping for a better option. But I guess there is no other option in this case. Thanks for the reply.