Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'hold'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Software & Hardware Discussions
    • LabVIEW Community Edition
    • LabVIEW General
    • LabVIEW (By Category)
    • Hardware
  • Resources
    • LabVIEW Getting Started
    • GCentral
    • Code Repository (Certified)
    • LAVA Code on LabVIEW Tools Network
    • Code In-Development
    • OpenG
  • Community
    • LAVA Lounge
    • LabVIEW Feedback for NI
    • LabVIEW Ecosystem
  • LAVA Site Related
    • Site Feedback & Support
    • Wiki Help

Categories

  • *Uncertified*
  • LabVIEW Tools Network Certified
  • LabVIEW API
    • VI Scripting
    • JKI Right-Click Framework Plugins
    • Quick Drop Plugins
    • XNodes
  • General
  • User Interface
    • X-Controls
  • LabVIEW IDE
    • Custom Probes
  • LabVIEW OOP
  • Database & File IO
  • Machine Vision & Imaging
  • Remote Control, Monitoring and the Internet
  • Hardware

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Personal Website


Company Website


Twitter Name


LinkedIn Profile


Facebook Page


Location


Interests

Found 1 result

  1. Needing to capture a peak value. Not willing to rely on sofware timing for fear of missing the actual peak in between LabVIEW read cycles. So...might anyone know of an NI hardware (module or standalone) which can capture peaks on its own, holding that value until the next LabVIEW read query? That is to say, an amplifier with this built-in (possibly as analog) inside the module? Sure, I can build one from scratch, but it seems a feature many others would want. I rather think that NI might have it as an option in one or another module for CompacDAQ, etc. But I fail to locoate it and NI's website is not much help, directing me off in different directions. And yes, I know I asked a similar question one time before, but got only a software answer. I'm specifically interested only in a hardware recommendation. The software iteration loop is intrinsically too slow.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.