Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'leak'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Software & Hardware Discussions
    • LabVIEW General
    • LabVIEW (By Category)
    • Hardware
  • Resources
    • LabVIEW Getting Started
    • OpenG
    • Code Repository (Certified)
    • LAVA Code on LabVIEW Tools Network
    • Code In-Development
  • Community
    • LAVA Lounge
    • LabVIEW Feedback for NI
    • LabVIEW Ecosystem
  • LAVA Site Related
    • Site Feedback & Support
    • Wiki Help

Categories

  • *Uncertified*
  • LabVIEW Tools Network Certified
  • LabVIEW API
    • VI Scripting
    • JKI Right-Click Framework Plugins
    • Quick Drop Plugins
    • XNodes
  • General
  • User Interface
    • X-Controls
  • LabVIEW IDE
    • Custom Probes
  • LabVIEW OOP
  • Database & File IO
  • Machine Vision & Imaging
  • Remote Control, Monitoring and the Internet
  • Hardware

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Personal Website


Company Website


Twitter Name


LinkedIn Profile


Facebook Page


Location


Interests

Found 2 results

  1. Hello! It was found that the function Request Deallocation does not free memory after using an array of strings (or any other multi-dimensional array). Description of the experiment: There is a VI from which subVI is called by command. In the subVI only one-dimensional array (numbers or strings) generated. If the array element type is number (I32), then allocated memory is released (using the function Request Deallocation). If the array element type is string (or any other multi-dimensional array), the memory will not be released. Anyone faced this problem? If yes, what should we do? Excuse for bad english. main.vi memoryusage.vi
  2. Cross posted from : http://forums.ni.com...ht/true#M702675 Hi I have a memory leak on my application. By observing with the "Desktop Execution Trace Toolkit", the Power Spectrum function (from NI_AALPro.lvlib) seems to have two "Reference leak". The first one refers to the function "Open VI reference"; I got around this problem by replacing the "Open VI reference" by an "Initialize" input boolean, but I don't understand the second memory leak. Any idea ? Thanks... (See attachments : Desktop Execution Trace + code) LV8.6.1 + Desktop Execution Trace Toolkit 2009 Same problem with LV2012 + Desktop Execution Trace Toolkit 2012 MemoryLeakPowerSpectrum.zip
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.