Aristos Queue Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 There's an idea I'd really like to see implemented in LV but I haven't got traction for it, so I need kudos from the community if it is ever going to happen. I posted it to the LV Idea Exchange here. Please review the idea and kudos it if you think its worth implementing! Quote Link to comment
Daklu Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 54 kudos and it can't get traction!? There's no hope whatsoever for any of my ideas.... Quote Link to comment
Cat Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 54 kudos and it can't get traction!? There's no hope whatsoever for any of my ideas.... Bad news: out of the literally hundreds of ideas only 5 are "In Development" Good news: 1 of those 5 is rankied 24th in # of kudos. I'm assuming ease of implementation is also considered along with kudos. At least that's how I'd do it. So there's always hope! A little bit, anyway. Quote Link to comment
Daklu Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 I'm assuming ease of implementation is also considered along with kudos. I'm sure you're correct. I also suspect there are ideas being worked on (perhaps to a lesser extent) that have not been marked "in development." I meant it as kind of a tongue-in-cheek comment but we don't have a smiley to convey that. Quote Link to comment
crelf Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 There's an idea I'd really like to see implemented in LV but I haven't got traction for it, so I need kudos from the community if it is ever going to happen. I posted it to the LV Idea Exchange here. Please review the idea and kudos it if you think its worth implementing! Please please please kudos this idea - it's really important if we're going to go forward on making the error handling in LabVIEW better! Quote Link to comment
Cat Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 Personally I think it's kinda strange that AQs ideas don't just... automatically happen. Quote Link to comment
Norm Kirchner Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 One thing that really really really .....wait.... wait for it..... really really really... bothers me about the marrying of XControls to classes is that the minute you have an XControl on a FP that uses a class, the class is locked. I agree that this is a worthwhile idea, and I've already kudo'd it, but the difficulty developing under this paradigm when doing this needs to be addressed. (or am I wrong) Quote Link to comment
crelf Posted December 9, 2009 Report Share Posted December 9, 2009 One thing that ... bothers me about the marrying of XControls to classes is that the minute you have an XControl on a FP that uses a class, the class is locked. I totally agree - and that issue is discussed over on the idea exchange. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.