Aristos Queue Posted August 8, 2011 Report Share Posted August 8, 2011 Here's a list of ideas that just appeared on the Idea Exchange... they're all from a user "jcase", whose name is in blue, meaning he's an NI employee. JCase is the main developer of the new ACBR feature. As you might guess from the list of ideas, he sees a lot of ways that the ACBR could be extended in the future... Allow Remote Asynchronous Calls Allow Asynchronous Call By Reference with Strict, Static VI Reference Add Asynchronous Call By Reference to Call Setup Dialog Typeless Call By Reference and Asynchronous Call By Reference [/url] Add Timeout Input to Wait On Asynchronous Call Node Integrate Asynchronous Call By Reference with Event Structure Please kudos as you see fit... 1 Quote Link to comment
mje Posted August 8, 2011 Report Share Posted August 8, 2011 With one exception I asked myself those questions as to why they weren't implemented as soon as I played with the new ACBR features. I hope the ideas are expanded on! Quote Link to comment
Val Brown Posted August 9, 2011 Report Share Posted August 9, 2011 Here's a list of ideas that just appeared on the Idea Exchange... they're all from a user "jcase", whose name is in blue, meaning he's an NI employee. JCase is the main developer of the new ACBR feature. As you might guess from the list of ideas, he sees a lot of ways that the ACBR could be extended in the future... Allow Remote Asynchronous Calls Allow Asynchronous Call By Reference with Strict, Static VI Reference Add Asynchronous Call By Reference to Call Setup Dialog Typeless Call By Reference and Asynchronous Call By Reference Add Timeout Input to Wait On Asynchronous Call Node Integrate Asynchronous Call By Reference with Event Structure Please kudos as you see fit... These shouldn't remain unregistered but acted upon....definitively! Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.