Report From 8.2 to 2009...any issues? in LAVA Lounge Posted April 30, 2010 · Edited April 30, 2010 by LogMAN We have used LV2009 for one large project and never since. That was because of many failures. For instance: Error in Line XYZ in MemoryManager.cpp. LabVIEW crashed with this error every 2-3 runs. Also after we updated to LV2009 SP1... We switched back to LV8.6.1f1 and everything works fine. Also the VI and EXE files were larger (LV2009: 15Mib / LV8.6.1f1: 12Mib) We use almost everything of LabVIEW, except of Mathscript and Remotepanels. Our applications have about 200 - 300 self made VIs. We are in need of better multicore processing, but LV2009 is to unstable. But I think, wether to use LV2009 or not depends on your needs. If you do parallel computing and need more performance using multicore processor, LV2009 might be a good choice. If you only do "normal" stuff, LV8.2 or LV8.6 / LV8.6.1f1 is the better choice for now. Install LV2009 on one computer, load some of your projects and do some tests. (Also perform some errors!!!) Greetings, LogMAN
From 8.2 to 2009...any issues?
in LAVA Lounge
Posted · Edited by LogMAN
We have used LV2009 for one large project and never since.
That was because of many failures.
For instance: Error in Line XYZ in MemoryManager.cpp.
LabVIEW crashed with this error every 2-3 runs. Also after we updated to LV2009 SP1...
We switched back to LV8.6.1f1 and everything works fine.
Also the VI and EXE files were larger (LV2009: 15Mib / LV8.6.1f1: 12Mib)
We use almost everything of LabVIEW, except of Mathscript and Remotepanels.
Our applications have about 200 - 300 self made VIs.
We are in need of better multicore processing, but LV2009 is to unstable.
But I think, wether to use LV2009 or not depends on your needs.
If you do parallel computing and need more performance using multicore processor,
LV2009 might be a good choice.
If you only do "normal" stuff, LV8.2 or LV8.6 / LV8.6.1f1 is the better choice for now.
Install LV2009 on one computer, load some of your projects and do some
tests. (Also perform some errors!!!)
Greetings, LogMAN