Jump to content

LogMAN

Members
  • Content Count

    426
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

LogMAN last won the day on March 27

LogMAN had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

130

2 Followers

About LogMAN

  • Rank
    Extremely Active
  • Birthday 04/06/1989

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Germany

LabVIEW Information

  • Version
    LabVIEW 2019
  • Since
    2008

Recent Profile Visitors

4,673 profile views
  1. In the article it says: "The ability to create modes and overloads isn’t publicly available in the newest version of LabVIEW NXG; however, we’re looking to extend these features to our user base soon."
  2. Are you okay with people using your work and selling it as their own, perhaps making a lot of money with it? Do you want to be attributed for your work, if someone uses it in their project (or sell it as their own)? Are you okay with other people using your name to sell your work as their own? In my opinion BSD 3-Clause is a good choice if you want to be attributed without any liability or warranty. Look at SQLite Library and JSONtext for reference (they use BSD 2-Clause). Note that BSD 3-Clause is the same as BSD 2-Clause, but "with a 3rd clause that prohibits others from using the name of the project or its contributors to promote derived products without written consent." Unlicense puts your work into public domain, so there is no copyright holder. You also don't reserve any rights to your own work (anyone can do whatever with it). MIT is in some ways similar to BSD but without the need for attribution. It is a pretty popular choice though. DBAD and WTFPL need to be placed in every source file, because they apply to single files only. They also don't really address the issue. If an author didn't want anyone to sell their work as their own, they probably shouldn't place it under public domain in the first place. I'm always surprised by people who make their work open source or public domain and then complain if other people use it. What did they expect?
  3. There is an option to mass-edit VI documentations in VIPM, although it's probably not the right tool. Maybe you can hack a solution. I don't recall if there is a function for this in the OpenG libraries, but they all have license notices and I would be surprised if they were edited by hand. There is a tool for that (of course): https://choosealicense.com/ If you don't want to accept contributions or issues for your repository, make it an archived (read-only) repository or put a notice in your readme file (anyone is free to fork and change it anyway). There is a blog post on how to do it on GitHub: https://github.blog/2017-11-08-archiving-repositories/ Vision is not my area of interest, so I wouldn't use it as a product, but I like to browse projects to learn about problem solving strategies and perhaps find a few nuggets. Don't worry about style or documentation, especially if it's a gift. I'm sure there are a few people on LAVA that are more than happy to get something new to fiddle with 🙂
  4. Very strange. Ping looks fine. TTL=128 also indicates that the machines are on the same network, so packages should send fine. Are you able to copy large files between the systems with reasonable speed? Also, you can use Wireshark to monitor traffic between your machines. That way you can check if a package gets lost, resend or blocked by other data. In the past I had trouble with cheap NICs that weren't able to keep up with many small packages because of checksum offloading. This was particularly problematic on Windows 7 and seems to be fixed on Windows 10. You can try disabling it in your NIC settings. Note that there are multiple offload options.
  5. @kronoseleven What is the ping between your clients? As @drjdpowell mentioned, 16.2 seconds is not normal. The no-delay function won't do much of a difference.
  6. It works slightly better if you select the control first (the dots stay visible). Still, poor design choice. They actually don't work well on different zoom levels. Edit: How do you attach videos but not display them into a post (does it automatically for me)? This thing is freaking huge... NXG Resize Array Zoomed.mp4
  7. Here are some of mine. SystemDesigner - Although it is essentially MAX and only works with NI hardware, I like the fact that it provides an overview of the hardware, access to various documents (pinout, specs) and the ability to create and test measurement tasks from within LabVIEW. Not to mention the auto-generated code when placing tasks into VIs. Captured Data - Finally I can easily capture, export and import data without having to write custom code. Capture data once and use it often. This is very useful for testing code in development and prevents misuse of "Make Current Values Default", which tends to bloat VIs. It is also possible to just drop data into any compatible control (i.e. graph) without any manual labor. Build Queue - It is somewhat broken, but I like the fact that it can build packages in parallel. There is great potential for much faster builds when compared to CG, especially for large an complex projects. Learning - I like the way NXG guides users through learning projects (of which there are quite a few). Highlighting elements in the UI is very helpful for self-paced learning. Online Help - Not specifically a feature of NXG, but I like the way the new manual is structured. The context help could use some improvement though. Controls and indicators - I like the design of NXG controls and indicators. They look much better than modern controls in CG, especially when used in combination with a Windows 10 theme. That said, I hope they add support for system controls soon. Automatic File Organization - This is probably number one or two of features in NXG I really like. Moving files inside a project now automatically moves files on disk. No more housekeeping. Still, I miss virtual folders a lot.
  8. You probably got it from this KB article (also includes VIs for other platforms): https://knowledge.ni.com/KnowledgeArticleDetails?id=kA00Z0000019NZfSAM
  9. If memory serves right, this is because LabVIEW does not take Windows themes into account. Essentially, the window drawn by LabVIEW gets surrounded by a border that is provided by Windows. You should see different results if you change your theme to one that has smaller or no borders. Also, Window Bounds does not include the window border. It is implicitly mentioned in the context help: "The four elements in the cluster are the top, left, bottom, and right values of the front panel window, which includes the interior region, scroll bars, title bar, menu bar, and toolbar." Your best bet is to use Window Bounds and subtract the border size manually. Unfortunately, it will break again if the user changes themes.
  10. I think what you are looking for is this: I haven't tested it, but your VI should stay within the boundary of a single screen.
  11. This is what happens when you change the UI scaling while NXG launches (because what else is there to do?) And icons can be a little frustrating at times... Icons make me happy.mp4
  12. One thing I absolutely like about NXG is the fact that it goes to extreme levels for absolutely no reason. What could possibly go wrong? Yes, this is a single VI. NXG 4.0 has a terminal limit of 128x126x126x128. Yay, no more clusters
  13. I'm putting this out here in case anyone missed it. NI has made all of their online training courses available for free to the global engineering community. The period was just extended to at least May 31, 2020 (previously April 30, 2020). Those who are new to LabVIEW and want to start with LabVIEW Community Edition should take a look at Getting Started with LabVIEW Community Edition. For further reading, check out NI’s Response to the Evolving COVID-19 Situation.
  14. You are unable to activate the community edition with a pro license. It is always activated with a 365-day community license.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.