Jump to content

LogMAN

Members
  • Content Count

    535
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    51

LogMAN last won the day on February 1

LogMAN had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

180

4 Followers

About LogMAN

  • Rank
    The 500 club
  • Birthday 04/06/1989

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Germany

LabVIEW Information

  • Version
    LabVIEW 2019
  • Since
    2008

Recent Profile Visitors

5,893 profile views
  1. A Static VI Reference is simply a constant Generic VI Reference. There is no way to distinguish one from another. It's like asking for the difference between a string constant and a string returned by a function. The Strictly Typed VI Reference @Darren mentioned is easily distinguishable from a Generic VI Reference (notice the orange ⭐ on the Static VI Reference). However, if you wire the type specifier to the Open VI Refnum function, the types are - again - indistinguishable. Perhaps you can use VI Scripting to locate Static VI Reference
  2. Sure thing, it's also good to know there is a thread like that - first time I've head of it 😮
  3. The number to string functions all have a width parameter: Number To Decimal String Function - LabVIEW 2018 Help - National Instruments (ni.com) As long as you can guarantee that the number of digits does not exceed the specified width, it will always produce a string with fixed length (padded with spaces).
  4. I discovered a potential memory corruption when using Variant To Flattened String and Flattened String To Variant functions on Sets. Here is the test code: In this example, the set is serialized and de-serialized without changing any data. The code runs in a loop to increase the chance of crashing LabVIEW. Here is the type descriptor. If you are familiar with type descriptors, you'll notice that something is off: Here is the translation: 0x0008 - Length of the type descriptor in bytes, including the length word (8 bytes) => OK 0x0073 - Data type (Set
  5. There is a VI in OpenG LabVIEW Data Library that does this for you. I took this as a challenge and added two VIs to my library on GitHub - https://github.com/LogMANOriginal/LabVIEW-Composition Decompose Map extracts variant keys and values of variant maps Decompose Set extracts variant elements of variant sets I have successfully tested these VIs with various different types, but there could still be bugs. Let me know if you find anything. I strongly discourage using these in production!
  6. Only the name is deleted, commits are left untouched. It is actually possible to restore the branch name if you know the commit hash - https://stackoverflow.com/a/2816728 This can be useful if you deleted a branch before it was merged into master, or if you want to branch off a specific commit in the history that is currently unlabeled. Here is some documentation from Atlassian, generally applicable to GitHub as well: Git Branch | Atlassian Git Tutorial Pull Requests | Atlassian Git Tutorial
  7. The Network Graph mentioned by @JKSH does give you some visualization on GitHub. I personally prefer the visualization in Sourcetree and bash. Here is an example for GitHub - microsoft/vscode: Visual Studio Code The command I use is git log --oneline --graph You can see that branches still exist even after merging. Only the name of the branch, which is just a fast way to address a specific commit hash, is lost (although it is typically mentioned in the commit message). That said, some branches can be merged without an explicit merge commit. This is called "fast-forw
  8. Here is some information about this error: VISA Error -1073807339 (0xbfff0015) Timeout Expired Before Operation Completed - National Instruments (ni.com) There could be many reasons for a timeout error. The error message only indicates that a timeout occurred before a reply was received, which is not very useful. NI IO Trace might give you some additional clues. Maybe put the master in a shift-register on your while loop. Not sure if that makes a difference. This is specified in the Modbus Application Protocol, although implementations vary between 1-based and 0-based. The
  9. You got it right. "Delete branch" will delete the branch on your fork. It does not affect the clone on your computer. The idea is that every pull request has its own branch, which, once merged into master, can safely be deleted. This can indeed be confusing if you are used to centralized VCSs. In Git, any repository can be remote. When you clone a Git repository, the source becomes remote to the clone. It doesn't matter if the remote is on your computer or on another server. You can even have multiple remote repositories if you wanted to. You'll notice that the clone - by def
  10. For starters, there are a few DWarns: c:\nimble\penguin\labview\components\mgcore\trunk\18.0\source\ThEvent.cpp(216) : DWarn 0xECE53844: DestroyPlatformEvent failed with MgErr 42. e:\builds\penguin\labview\branches\2018\dev\source\typedesc\TDTableCompatibilityHack.cpp(829) : DWarn 0xA0314B81: Accessing invalid index: 700 e:\builds\penguin\labview\branches\2018\dev\source\objmgr\OMLVClasses.cpp(2254) : DWarn 0x7E77990E: OMLVParam::OMLVParam: invalid datatype for "Build IGL" e:\builds\penguin\labview\branches\2018\dev\source\typedesc\TypeManagerObjects.cpp(818) : DWarn 0x43305D39: chgtosrc o
  11. LogMAN

    Dear NI

    It could be open source and still be maintained by NI, as long as they have a way to generate revenue. There is also great potential in the NXG platform, which - as far as I know - is written in C#. Even if LabVIEW is not of interest to millions of people, keep in mind that most open source projects only receive contributions from a small portion of their users. The Linux kernel is probably not a good comparison, because it is orders of magnitudes more complex than LabVIEW. Nevertheless, Linux "only" received contributions from approx. 16k developers between 2005 and 2017 - 2017 Linux Ker
  12. Good selection by @Mefistotelis Try to figure out what motivates them (games, machines, information, ...) and help them find the right resources. Try different things, perhaps something sticks. If not, move on to the next. Here are two links that can get you started with python in a few minutes. Take your first steps with Python - Learn | Microsoft Docs Python Getting Started (w3schools.com)
  13. Not sure where you got that. It's a valid approach: Command pattern - LabVIEW Wiki The Actor Framework, for example, takes this idea to the extreme. I'm not a fan of the 0ms timeout case because it adds unnecessary polling. The rest sounds good to me. It is probably best if you build a prototype to see what works best for you.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.