Grampa_of_Oliva_n_Eden

I do not know if it helps but... I was reading the on one of those USB-cDAQ devices and it said it could only support one active task at a time. So maybe there are devices that do allow more than one active task at a time in which case the behaviour may be correct and appropriate. Ben

QUOTE(crelf @ Aug 13 2007, 04:28 PM) No, I spell most things wrong. The breaking Ohms Law idea remnded me of a wise crack one of my Material Science Proffesor hit me with when I remarked, "So all I have to do is come up with a non-condicting form of steel and I can eleimnate rust?" He said "Sure, but let me know first. I would love to win a Nobel Prize in Physiscs." I got a similar answer from a physics proffesor when I asked if anything had a negative coefficient of friction. Imagine it, set something down on a flat table and it starts to accelerate! No, on second thought, forget everything I said. Ben

QUOTE(ASTDan @ Aug 13 2007, 03:11 PM) Ditto Dan's reply. If you figure out how to break Ohm's law, let me know, I still need an Noble Prize in Physics to add to my collection. Ben

QUOTE(crelf @ Aug 13 2007, 02:22 PM) Is that what they fed us at the last LV Chmpions Dinner when JR was still our keeper? If so, I did not like it. Give me prime rib any day. Ben

QUOTE(crelf @ Aug 13 2007, 02:18 PM) I was doing thin-film fero-electrics myself. My second LV project used a 6111 to grab hyteresis curves in order to characterize hardness. Welcome to LAVA! Ben PS: Osmething up there just has to be mis-spelled!

QUOTE(Puzzlemaker @ Aug 13 2007, 11:48 AM) That looks like Read from Spreadsheet or Write to Speadsheet file will handle that with not problems. Ben

QUOTE(Puzzlemaker @ Aug 13 2007, 11:31 AM) :question: Clarification question: Could you post a cluster or an array of clusters that shows the data you need to write or restore from file? That will help us advise. :thumbup: Ben

QUOTE(shoneill @ Aug 13 2007, 08:42 AM) I trhink it was LV 6.1 that last had that restriction. It amounted to a limit of 550 controls ( customers called about this limit) and as a result I wrote a utility to count controls just so I would not get blind-sided. Ben

I can't take time to look the attachec code but let me add... If I understand correctly, the FP also uses a type descriptor that is made up all of the objects on it. The cluster may be just "the straw the breaks the camels back". Ben

QUOTE(Yuri33 @ Aug 10 2007, 10:29 AM) Depending which version of LV this may or may not work. LV 8.0 and up handles 64 bit file pointers (I believe). Prior to that, the file offset was limited to 32 bits. But even then the file I/O primatives tracked the file size internally using 64 bit, so as long as you just let the file I/O stuff track the file pointer, it would still work. HDF5 will also handle files that large. Under Windows XP and prior you could seldom read in ALL of the file at once becuase Windows could only provid about 1.2 G of memory. Ben

QUOTE(LV Punk @ Aug 10 2007, 07:37 AM) Arrrgghhhhh!!!! Ben to Wife: How many more years until I can retire? Wife: Just keep working. Ben

Ton, You said one of your PC's is OK. How about copying the ini from that machine to the defective one. If that works can you post your INI back here? Ben

QUOTE(tcplomp @ Aug 9 2007, 08:59 AM) In an attempt to put a positive spin on this one.... Maybe now the LabVIEW Champions will be able to name an Express VI. Ben

QUOTE(skof @ Aug 9 2007, 10:40 AM) CRELF invented GOBs if that helps. http://forums.lavag.org/Node-count-versus-SLOC-t3632.html&pid=14612&mode=threaded#entry14612' target="_blank">http://forums.lavag.org/Node-count-versus-...aded#entry14612 Ben

QUOTE(Darren @ Aug 8 2007, 11:24 AM) From what I have seen this just may do the trick! The question that remains is do those other code constructs manifest this issue. Let us get back to you. Ben

QUOTE(Dirk J. @ Aug 8 2007, 10:20 AM) Thank you Dirk! I stand corrected. Ben

QUOTE(adriaanrijllart @ Aug 8 2007, 09:27 AM) Should the contant be "1"or "0" ? Ben

QUOTE(Tomi Maila @ Aug 8 2007, 05:11 AM) This bug got me think as well. How many times have you written (or read) that writing to a property node involves a buffer copy? This bug demonstrates that rule of thumb as false. I wonder if Dareen can develop a VI nalyzer test that will nial this contsruct? I'll e-mail him. Ben

QUOTE(Aristos Queue @ Aug 7 2007, 02:14 PM) Concidering who asked that question, I had to stop and double check myself. http://forums.lavag.org/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=6556''>http://forums.lavag.org/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=6556'>http://forums.lavag.org/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=6556 The arrays size is "1-based" and the iteration terminal is "zero-based". We need to decrement the array size before we enter the loop (which make the code even more complicated!). Then again, maybe I'm missing something. Ben

The KB on the new For loop http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/6285 Figure 4 of the new For loop is not equaly to Figure 1 ! http://forums.lavag.org/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=6555 Now I feel better! Ben

QUOTE(Aristos Queue @ Aug 7 2007, 09:39 AM) A big "ata-boy" to whoever got that in place. It made avery good first impression on me. Ben

QUOTE(Tomi Maila @ Aug 6 2007, 04:03 PM) :question: :clock: No. Just the one that wants it fixed. Ben

QUOTE(crelf @ Aug 6 2007, 03:13 PM) Wow! Two buses loaded with engineers and scientists. I hope there aren't any flat tires on the way because it would takes days to settle if an object or component oriented approach should be used. Even worse if there was an electrical problem. Someone would hit ctrl-b and the next thing you know they will have to call for a backup! Have fun all! Ben

QUOTE(Tomi Maila @ Aug 6 2007, 12:49 PM) OK, I'll do it this time but if you ever make Champion (hack, cough cough...), I'll expect you to do all of the bug reports. Service Request = 1007895. Matt will update this thread with CAR once filled. Ben

QUOTE(Tomi Maila @ Aug 6 2007, 12:38 PM) I'll take care of reporting this to NI. Ben