Jump to content

AnalogKid2DigitalMan

Members
  • Posts

    275
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by AnalogKid2DigitalMan

  1. From The Salt Lick's home page:

    You've found "The Salt Lick" so named by owner Hisako Roberts and her husband, the late Thurman Roberts, because "a Salt Lick is something where all the animals congregate. There is something good, something essential about it."

    Since alpha has deemed that 97.73% of us are at animal level, I think the place is going to be packed.

    Sounds like a good time!

  2. QUOTE(Nullllll @ Mar 23 2007, 01:19 PM)

    it does not work!!! how can i do it

    Have you tried sending it a Nullllll String?? :lightbulb:

    Please post what you have so far.

    You remind me of someone(s) else.

    Yen- Nice site you linked

  3. QUOTE(dthomson @ Mar 22 2007, 12:42 PM)

    >The good ol 7805 is a robust 5V regulator. Heres a link for a sample circuit.

    The 7805 is simple to use and a great solution for many situations. Keep in mind the efficiency, though. Running a 7805 off 12 volts means you'll get less than 40% efficiency, so for each Watt of 5V power you use, you'll be putting 1.5 Watts of heat into your system. A DC-DC converter, on the other hand, can be found with at least 80% efficiency, so the same 1 Watt of 5V power would only dump 250mW of waste heat. Since you mentioned that it is a low power system and you were concerned about efficiency, I thought it might be worth pointing out.

    Dave T

    Good point Dave. I took low power to mean low current requirements on the load, not that it was power limited. Power consumption is the crirtcal issue- taken from a battery, I figured his system had other power sources to power it. Not too many details to go on.

  4. Gary:

    I ran your original vi on my older Dell Precision 370 2.8GHz single core (circa 8-2004), 512M RAM (185M free) LV8.2 Win XP SP2. 81-82msec consistently (FASTER)

    The original test I ran was on a Precision 380 circa 5-2005

    I do not know RAM specifics, but using AIDA32 I did memory Read/Write tests.

    Pecision 370: Read 5274MB/sec, Write 2081MB/sec

    Precision 380: Read 5578MB/sec, Write 2152 MB/sec.

    Do not know why the slower 370 memory executes faster.

  5. LV 8.2 1st run 166, 2nd run 106, 3rd through 5th runs 96-97. LV freshly opened with your code

    Running P4 Duo Core 2.8GHz, 1G RAM (500M free), Win XP Pro SP2.

    It was odd that the first run was so slow, 2nd run was faster, subsequent runs faitly repeatable. Maybe an initial memory allocation?

    Sorry, only 8.2 available to me.

  6. Presuming you are running under a Windows OS, such timing cannot be achieved in software. There is just too much overhead from the OS, in addition when another process takes prioirity over your vi, timing will become slower and unpredictable. You could look at timed loops though, but performance may not be up to your requirements.

    You need a hardware solution- a DAQ card with counters/timers to get short duration and accurate pulse trains with adjustable duty cycles. Or possibly LabVIEW RealTime (RT). Another alternative, since you are attempting motion control is to get a dedicated motion control card.

  7. From block diagram, select Dialog & User Interface Functions, then Prompt User for Input function (an Express vi)

    alnaimi: May I suggest as part of your LV learning, take the time to go through every function pallate available to you and browse through each of them to see what canned functions are available. Not that you should build a vi around them to test and try each one, but rather let what is available to sink into your mind. Then when you have a task to accomplish, draw on your memory to say- ah, yes, I remember seeing a Max and Min function for an array- that could be of use for what I have to do.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.