Bobillier Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 Hi I try to upgrade my old subscription "RTM to Emum" to LV2009 and have problem with Rtm data structure. There is a small modification of this structure between 7.0 and 2009 LV version but i don't know which. Any suggestion. I send you the 7.0 data structure for exempl. RTM data.ctl Quote Link to comment
Dan DeFriese Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 (edited) Hi I try to upgrade my old subscription "RTM to Emum" to LV2009 and have problem with Rtm data structure. There is a small modification of this structure between 7.0 and 2009 LV version but i don't know which. Any suggestion. I send you the 7.0 data structure for exempl. RTM data.ctl I think the change was between 8.2 and 8.5. I don't know if it changed again in 2009. I couldn't get you're original to work with 8.5 the way you had it before so I hacking a simple state machine to parse through file. It still works as of 8.6 (I don't have 2009 yet.) Kind of a hack job, but it works for me and may be enough to get started on repairing you're CR submission. Hope this helps. ~Dan rtm to enum 8.5.zip Edited October 23, 2009 by Dan DeFriese Quote Link to comment
Bobillier Posted October 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 (edited) Thank But that's not work in LV2009. The parser lock on get id state. I investigate more and see that the problem is arround "special application code". When i put a "separator line" in my menu that's bug, but when i remove them it's OK. Edited October 23, 2009 by BOBILLIER Quote Link to comment
Dan DeFriese Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 Thank But that's not work in LV2009. The parser lock on get id state. I investigate more and see that the problem is arround "special application code". When i put a "separator line" in my menu that's bug, but when i remove them it's OK. Hmm... The separator line throws off the parser in 8.6 as well. I don't remember ever using a separator line. Oops... After messing around the "APP_SEPARATOR" tag was being cut off to "APP_SEPARA". It looks like the Read From Text File primative had the 'Convert EOL' option enabled which changed the string length from 0Dh (13) to 0Ah (10). Try it again. rtm to enum 81.5.zip Quote Link to comment
Bobillier Posted October 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 Hmm... The separator line throws off the parser in 8.6 as well. I don't remember ever using a separator line. Oops... After messing around the "APP_SEPARATOR" tag was being cut off to "APP_SEPARA". It looks like the Read From Text File primative had the 'Convert EOL' option enabled which changed the string length from 0Dh (13) to 0Ah (10). Try it again. Thanks that' s ok Now. Just a last things, I have removed your test about Level because in my case this test forget first line menu tag. Regards Eric Quote Link to comment
Dan DeFriese Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 Thanks that' s ok Now. Just a last things, I have removed your test about Level because in my case this test forget first line menu tag. Regards Eric Great! I'm glad it worked... If I get motivated this weekend I might try to make a RCF plugin based on this so you could right click an enum on the block diagram and update it from the *.rtm file directly. Quote Link to comment
Bobillier Posted October 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 Great! I'm glad it worked... If I get motivated this weekend I might try to make a RCF plugin based on this so you could right click an enum on the block diagram and update it from the *.rtm file directly. Great Idea. But if I can suggest one remark, maybe will It be better to include the possibilty to create Case in case structure from Rtm data than enum. And to be more precise, It would be better if this idea would be included in the excellent RCF Caseselect Plug-in. But it's just suggestions. Thanks again for your help and good luck for RCF. Eric Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.