Gary Rubin Posted November 13, 2006 Report Posted November 13, 2006 hooovahh said: Yeah never had quantum mechanics but I'm sure it's like NASCAR. when ever some thing weird happens and their interviewing the driver they ramble on and on about stuff then they usually say "well that's racing for you" In my 4 physics classes in which I was exposed to quantum mechanics, I don't think I ever heard it compared to NASCAR... Now, if the cars could tunnel through the retaining walls, that would be another story... hooovahh said: "Why is the sky blue?" Rayleigh scattering. (Sorry, couldn't resist) Quote
crelf Posted November 13, 2006 Report Posted November 13, 2006 peteski said: ...perhaps I'm forgetting some odd quantum "spin" exclusion thing-a-ma-gig rule or something. spin, charge, colour - pick whatever you like Gary Rubin said: Now, if the cars could tunnel through the retaining walls, that would be another story... Now you're talking about a shit-load of energy! Quote
jpdrolet Posted November 13, 2006 Report Posted November 13, 2006 Well with LabVIEW 2+2=5 seems right for large values of 2. 2+2=3 seems equally good for small values of 2. OT Trivia: what is the last decimal digit of 2? Download File:post-447-1163450115.vi Quote
crelf Posted November 13, 2006 Report Posted November 13, 2006 jpdrolet said: OT Trivia: what is the last decimal digit of 2? :arrow: Hint Quote
Michael Aivaliotis Posted November 16, 2006 Author Report Posted November 16, 2006 In case you're still interested... Quote
crelf Posted November 16, 2006 Report Posted November 16, 2006 Michael_Aivaliotis said: In case you're still interested... Crikey - that's a lot closer than I expected Quote
Dave Graybeal Posted November 16, 2006 Report Posted November 16, 2006 Wow, no kidding. I would have never guessed the numbers would be that close. I like firefox alot myself, however due to old habits I find that I still nearly always click on IE to surf the net. Some old habits die hard. That alone led me to believe that there would be a greater gap between the two. Dave Quote
LAVA 1.0 Content Posted November 16, 2006 Report Posted November 16, 2006 crelf said: Crikey - that's a lot closer than I expected AND fairly close to what I guessed! I've mentioned before I'm dyslexic, maybe that's why I got them reversed :laugh: Quote
jpdrolet Posted November 30, 2006 Report Posted November 30, 2006 Gee... IE7 was pushed as an automatic update on my computer this morning... Look at the first screen on startup: Translation: The level of your security setting exposes your computer to risks. We recommend to browse the Web with your current security settings. To solve this problem, click on the information bar above and then on Change the settings for me To continue your browsing with the current settings, click on the Start button (not recommended) Yeah, right. Now what am I supposed to do??? :thumbdown: Quote
crelf Posted November 30, 2006 Report Posted November 30, 2006 jpdrolet said: Yeah, right. Now what am I supposed to do??? Use FireFox. Quote
jpdrolet Posted November 30, 2006 Report Posted November 30, 2006 crelf said: Use FireFox. I do, I do. I started IE7 for mere curiosity. My curiosity is fully satisfied now. Quote
Dirk J. Posted November 30, 2006 Report Posted November 30, 2006 Hmmm, it may well be a preview of what to expect from Windows Vista.... jpdrolet said: I started IE7 for mere curiosity. My curiosity is fully satisfied now. Quote
crelf Posted November 30, 2006 Report Posted November 30, 2006 Dirk J. said: Hmmm, it may well be a preview of what to expect from Windows Vista.... As an aside Dirk J. - what is your avataar? It's insanely familiar, and is driving me crazy! Quote
Dirk J. Posted November 30, 2006 Report Posted November 30, 2006 .... is good for youit's an image I stole from the Guinness website a few years ago.i don't think it's on there anymore. Quote
crelf Posted November 30, 2006 Report Posted November 30, 2006 Dirk J. said: it's an image I stole from the Guinness website a few years ago. My goodness - my Guinness! Quote
Dirk J. Posted November 30, 2006 Report Posted November 30, 2006 ok, ok.... (it's not a bear, but still...) Quote
Gary Rubin Posted November 30, 2006 Report Posted November 30, 2006 Dirk J. said: ok, ok.... (it's not a bear, but still...) But this is... Quote
Dirk J. Posted November 30, 2006 Report Posted November 30, 2006 oh bruce, i am slow today.... crelf said: As an aside Dirk J. - what is your avataar? It's insanely familiar, and is driving me crazy! Gary Rubin said: But this is... and this... :beer: Quote
jpdrolet Posted January 15, 2007 Report Posted January 15, 2007 jpdrolet said: OT Trivia: what is the last decimal digit of 2? OK Time's up. Since 2 can be represented both by 2.0 and 1.9 (where the underscore represents a periodic digit) it seems that the notion of "last decimal digit" in the decimal representation is meaningless... Another useless post by jpdrolet Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.