Eugen Graf Posted September 2, 2007 Report Share Posted September 2, 2007 Hello, here my example code to show high frequency data with low CPU load. Eugen Quote Link to comment
jbrohan Posted September 4, 2007 Report Share Posted September 4, 2007 Thank you Eugene This is most helpful and instructive. It's a much better solution than I've been using up to now! Can I add hree comments (hopefully helpful) 1) The Flatten to string is not required if you format the queue as a cluster. 2) The split 1D array can be moved inside the case statement 3) The Buffer Size check can be moved inside the case too Yours Sincerely John Quote Link to comment
Eugen Graf Posted September 4, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 4, 2007 QUOTE(jbrohan @ Sep 3 2007, 02:25 PM) Thank you EugeneThis is most helpful and instructive. It's a much better solution than I've been using up to now! Can I add hree comments (hopefully helpful) 1) The Flatten to string is not required if you format the queue as a cluster. Right, I use only queues of type string in my programs, because of modules compatibility. For this example it is not requiered. QUOTE(jbrohan @ Sep 3 2007, 02:25 PM) 2) The split 1D array can be moved inside the case statement 3) The Buffer Size check can be moved inside the case too Yours Sincerely John The Buffer size control(terminal on BD) inside the case too. One more comment from me: Build array VI can eat some CPU, so you can better use "replace array subset". Than you have to know the max. buffer size in developing phase and probably limit the buffer size control to this max. size. Eugen Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.