Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


NATE last won the day on January 8 2013

NATE had the most liked content!

Community Reputation


About NATE

  • Rank
    More Active

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Hawthorne, CA

Contact Methods

LabVIEW Information

  • Version
    LabVIEW 2013
  • Since

Recent Profile Visitors

1,668 profile views
  1. Would you be able to post this? I'm about to write my own script to do the same thing. The two provided on this thread don't handle projects, libraries, and classes. I know there are good reasons to not touch this setting on a project, but currently our whole code base is intended to be source-only. Somehow we keep finding more VIs with compiled code intact. Did some brief searching and didn't find anything online more complete than what's here.
  2. I just experienced this with a method of a class in LV2013 SP1 f2. The other methods have a Remove from Library option, one didn't. No idea why. I renamed the method (since I was going to delete it anyway), and there's my menu item...
  3. I had a great time tonight at the LAVA BBQ and Challenge the Champions. Was great to meet more people. Thanks to everyone who helped organize.
  4. You still have time to enter the 7x7 lightning round competition and win a free pass to NI Week! This is your chance to show off some of the really cool projects you've worked on. Presentation can be high level or low level, no need to show code or anything prioprietary. We just want to be inspired by the cool stuff you've done! Email us if interested: nate@themoehrings.com and michael.aivaliotis@jki.net
  5. This year's You Call It (aka Open Theme) topic has received a lot of positive response (see Likes and replies here) as well as some valid concerns. We've now had some time for people to submit presentation ideas and I've begun to group them into "mini-tracks". I hope that by declaring official mini-tracks I can assuage the concerns previously voiced about this year's Open Theme. I'm grouping these presentation ideas based on the number of Likes they receive and the summit topics that received the most Likes. So keep voting to help shape the Summit, I really do look at them! Here are the
  6. We have some of the greatest jobs in the world! Not only do we get to tackle tough engineering challenges and make the world a better place, but we get to do it by drawing pictures in LabVIEW, fun! At the next CLA Summit, we want to celebrate your accomplishments. You're invited to take part in a friendly competition we're calling 7x7. In 60 minutes we want to hear up to 7 stories about how you're making the world a better place, the coolest technical challenges you have solved, the killer app, or the coolest feature you've created in LabVIEW. Here's the thing, you're limited to 1 min
  7. CLA Summit 2014 Theme: You Call It We're going to try something different this year for the 2014 CLA Americas Summit. There was no clear winner in the topic selection voting, so we want you to present on whatever topic you're most interested in! From the presentation abstracts that are submitted, we'll look for common topics and schedule them together to form mini-tracks. Depending on the number of volunteer presenters, we'll either select those that receive the most likes on the forum, or we may decide to schedule tracks in parallel. See full post here: https://decibel.ni.com/conte
  8. You say the CLA summit has great return on investment, show me the money! We're looking for testimonies from past CLA Summit attendees on tangible ways you or your company have benefited from something learned or discussed at the CLA Summit: improved architectures, processes, bug fixes, new features. How has the CLA Summit made you more profitable? I'll be compiling your testimonies and based on the responses determine the best way to present them to the community. Would love to have people volunteer to share their experiences and savings at the next Summit. This might become a regular p
  9. If you are a CLA, we want your feedback, the call for topic ideas for CLA Summit 2014 is here: https://decibel.ni.com/content/message/60510 Can't see the page? Please join the NI CLA Community page! CLA Summit 2014 will be March 3 - 5. We have some great ideas in the works and think this is going to be a very exciting Summit. Looking forward to it already! Thanks, Nate
  10. What is the impact of this Code Complexity threshold on built applications? I'm hoping that it has no impact, that when you perform a mass recompile or build into an application that all compiler optimizations are enabled, since the editor response time isn't really part of the equation. Can someone confirm this is true for me?
  11. Coming to the Americas' CLA Summit 2013 on March 4-6th? Got some company spirit you'd like to display? Bring some company swag and we'll use them as giveaways during the summit! Looking forward to March! Nate
  12. Dear CLAs, The time is almost up for presentation submissions for this year's CLA Summit, but we still want to hear from you. The topic is widely labeled "Delivering Professional Software". That's what we strive to do everyday so if you've got ideas on how to do that more effectively we want to hear them! Details are posted here: https://decibel.ni.com/content/message/44030#44030 Please do the following: Submit outline/idea to clasummit@ni.com Include 3-5 slides that will outline the main conversation points that you would highlight. If you are selected, you will be expected
  13. I've posted a new and improved version of this presentation. I think this version is much better than the original, so even if you read the original I ask that you would consider looking at it again. https://decibel.ni.c.../docs/DOC-18320 Motivation for this presentation: At the 2011 CLA Summit, NI asked us what we thought was missing from LabVIEW or what needed to be improved. I already knew AQ’s position on this, but my feedback to NI and direct conversation with AQ was that I thought LabVIEW needed to be able to invoke methods on object references. At the time that I said this, I knew
  14. Yes, but we all mentally compile that out of our thinking. We know that LabVIEW will only make a copy of the data when it needs to, so the part that is not immediately intuitive to me is that fact that wiring the branch to the Create DVR primitive is one of the rules LabVIEW uses to determine that a copy is required. I admit that it is internally coherent when you stop and really think about what pure dataflow is, but even though I've been using LabVIEW for 12 years I haven't really pondered all of it's finer implications. The majority of dataflow is very intuitive, that's why I love it.
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.