Jump to content

Ricardo de Abreu

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    12

  • Joined

  • Last visited

LabVIEW Information

  • Version
    LabVIEW 2014
  • Since
    2016

Ricardo de Abreu's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

0

Reputation

  1. Ricardo de Abreu
    I saw this guide! I was completely decided about BeagleBone but when I saw this guide, and some comparations on speed, and memory, the raspberry is much better.... On the other hand BeagleBone has much more IO and no need a SD card to boot For me BeagleBone is more indicated because of the interaction with the sensors and IOs But raspberry is more powerful... I don't know what to do...
  2. Ricardo de Abreu
    What about raspberry pi 4 board? Now I don't know witch one to buy Raspberry Pi4 vs BeagleBone Black Vs arduino.....
  3. Ricardo de Abreu
    Guys what about the PYNQ™ Z2 board? It is developed by a NI company... Is it compatible in anyway with LabView? it has a affordable price for me...
  4. Ricardo de Abreu
    I saw about myRIO S2.... But I can't afford one $200 USD is more then R$ 800 BRL while a BeagleBone Black is around R$ 300 BRL much more affordable for me.... Untill now my choose will be a BeagleBone Black or Green... Because the number of IO pins they have and because there is no need of a SD card to boot the system. But the lack of FPGA and the speed of it when compared to RPi that brings me down... I would like to see more options and solutions in this way but I don't know if they exist....
  5. Ricardo de Abreu
    I saw it on a YouTube video.... Just to convert to Arduino code is not the point... I was searching about the linx 3.0 and a BeagleBone Black board... That is probably the closest i can get for my needs... But as it is an "old" project maybe there is something newer and better boards that are also compatible.... With this project I saw she can deploy a VI directly to the board and communicate, just like myRIO does... Does anyone knows anything newer or better boards (with low budget, please)
  6. Ricardo de Abreu
    It sounds good! Really good!!!!!!!!! Can I still use a PC with a VI as a supervisor for the Arduino running the code?
  7. Ricardo de Abreu
    I did see the single board RIO, but that IS too much for me. My budget is 10% of the price... 100 USD at most. I would like not to use Arduino because I can't deploy the VI too it, and let it run for sometime collecting data stand alone. I was thinking of the BeagleBone black or BeagleBone AI or even raspberry pi Is there any better option? Regards
  8. Ricardo de Abreu
    Hi guys. This semester I'm starting a course system development for control and automation engineering, witch will be based on LabView. Therefore, my University doesn't have a NI hardware, even a MyRIO for us to test our VI and the teacher said that we should test our projects with our own Arduino... So, I have a little experience in Arduino and I know the basics for LabView. Now I'm in a point that I know that with Arduino I'll not take the best from LabView. I cannot even deploy a code to it. So, there is where my question comes in... I'm looking for a new board better then Arduino to use in the classes. I would buy a MyRIO card if I had the money but in Brazil this board is too expensive for me Witch one should I get that is closest to myRIO and less expensive than that? I would like to try de deployment of a VI and FPGA..... Is this possible? Thanks a lot for the help! Regards
  9. Ricardo de Abreu
    Tim_S, thanks for help. The speed is not the point, as the temperature varies slowly. It is the only data I really need (4 points). I need the oximeter data and some digital inputs, and outputs. not too complicated. you said i have to use tags, but Micrologix 1100 does not suport tags, it works with the address (ex. N7:0). I manage it to work with Advanced HMI using the address. Now keeps the problem with LabView.
  10. Ricardo de Abreu
    Hi Tim. the velocity is not that important. it will be just a data logger of a single point. It has to read 4 Temperatures + Oximeter + State and write some actions, as turn on the resistances, close door, etc... do you still have your project or a sample (with PLC scada). I don't know how to set up remote I/O device in the PLC. Thanks a lot
  11. Ricardo de Abreu
    Hi Guys, I'm with a trouble here. Recently we started to get our outdated temperature test cabinet to work, and the best way is to upgrade our PLC. But there cames 2 problems, the biggest is the budget, we do not have any money so we have to work with what we already have, and the second, i'm intern here and there is no one from automation to guide or help me. Now lets face the problem. PLC Allen Bradley micrologix 1100 cards: 1762-IQ16 and 1762-IQ8W6 My first thought is to use Labview to control the PLC, as HMI and data-logger without OPC server to simplify the instalation and cost. The communication: this is really where the problems begin. It will be done through Ethernet. I could not manage Ethernet/IP driver to work, nor pcc or CIP message... which is the best way to communicate? CIP Message, OPC, or any other i do not know? Do you guys see any problems to make a dataloger without OPC? Some things I have tryed Implementation of Common industrial Protocol (CIP) via EtherNet [EtherNet/IP (CIP)] https://lavag.org/topic/6104-industrial-ethernet-ethernetip/?page=1 Ethernet/IP Driver for Micrologix 1100 https://decibel.ni.com/content/docs/DOC-13024 EtherNet/IP Driver for Industrial Communication https://decibel.ni.com/content/docs/DOC-4065 Thanks for any help Ricardo PS. Originally posted at: https://decibel.ni.com/content/thread/47497
  12. Ricardo de Abreu
    Hi Guys, I'm with a trouble here. Recently we started to get our outdated temperature test cabinet to work, and the best way is to upgrade our PLC. But there cames 2 problems, the biggest is the budget, we do not have any money so we have to work with what we already have, and the second, i'm intern here and there is no one from automation to guide or help me. Now lets face the problem. PLC Allen Bradley micrologix 1100 cards: 1762-IQ16 and 1762-IQ8W6 My first thought is to use Labview to control the PLC, as HMI and data-logger without OPC server to simplify the instalation and cost. The communication: this is really where the problems begin. It will be done through Ethernet. I could not manage Ethernet/IP driver to work, nor pcc or CIP message... which is the best way to communicate? CIP Message, OPC, or any other i do not know? Do you guys see any problems to make a dataloger without OPC? Some things I have tryed Implementation of Common industrial Protocol (CIP) via EtherNet [EtherNet/IP (CIP)] https://lavag.org/topic/6104-industrial-ethernet-ethernetip/?page=1 Ethernet/IP Driver for Micrologix 1100 https://decibel.ni.com/content/docs/DOC-13024 EtherNet/IP Driver for Industrial Communication https://decibel.ni.com/content/docs/DOC-4065 Thanks for any help Ricardo PS. Originally posted at: https://decibel.ni.com/content/thread/47497
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

  I accept