Jump to content

Antoine Chalons

Members
  • Posts

    955
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    34

Posts posted by Antoine Chalons

  1. Do you remember back in the days (up to LabVIEW 6i) what we had to code before we had the event structure?

    Surely anyone would be annoyed to have to code with LabVIEW Base since there is no "event driven programming".. wel in fact that not totally true, because if you download LabVIEW evaluation version, it includes the event driven programming and the code generated can be opened and run with LabVIEW Base, you just can't edit or add anything related to events but well a second computer is cheaper than the cost difference between LabvIEW Base and Full.

    So what's the point in falsely removing the event driven programming from LabVIEW Base?

    I think this is an extremely bad move form NI.

    Plus, let's say some potential custom gets the evaluation version, likes it, get a Base license, figures out he's been screwed and now has to buy LabVIEW full to use event driven programming because his evaluation period is over... isn't it lying to customers?

  2. Are there any more detailed sources of information than the VBAI development manual installed with the toolkit?

    Not that I know about.

    I agree the documentation is a bit light.

    If you have specific questions about VBAI custom steps you can of course post here, but also on the Vision board on NI forums, the developers of VBAI do answer questions there.

  3. Fix it before you ship it.

    I understand the frustration of having to pay for a bug fixing version.

    But to be fair I don't think NI (or any other company that ships such a big soft) can wait until the product is 100% bug free. If you want LabVIEW 2010 to be released only when it has no bug at all it will be released in 2020. Big soft are released not when they are bug free, but when the market needs the new feature they bring. It's always been like that, if you want to take advantage of the new features you also have to cope with the new bugs.

    That's for shipping a version that still has bugs.

    That said, charging for a bug fixing version... well... if you were happy until then with LV2009, maybe you don't need to get the upgrade :-o

  4. I don't really understand the second part of the question.

    Sorry I wasn't very clear.

    What I call utility VIs are VIs you can plan in folders such as <LabVIEW folder>\wizard or <LabVIEW folder>\project, they can be launched respectively from the "File" or "Tools" menu bar.

    When these VIs execute they are in specific LabVIEW instance(or context), not the same instance were your project's VIs are.

    When editing VIs in this specific instance, you get some strange behaviours (e.g. broken arrow but VI is runnable) and I have notice that when I play too much into this, I get the same error as you got. It's just a feeling I had, maybe this issue is totally disconnected from that...

    So I was asking this to see if it could be the cause, but apparently not.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.