Jump to content

Bjarne Joergensen

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    122

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Bjarne Joergensen

  1. Bjarne Joergensen
    Hi Thanks I´ll stick to 2020 for both LabVIEW and TestStand There's a lot of thinks going on at NI that I think we all are a little bit nervous to hear about /Bjarne
  2. Bjarne Joergensen
    Hi We are going to upgrade our LabVIEW 2015 to ? Should we go for the latest version 2020, one in between or wait for 2021? We will also start using TestStand and I have the same question for that. 2020 or older. Thanks in advance Bjarne
  3. Bjarne Joergensen
    Sorry for late reaction. I manage to get i to work by using "Microsoft TreeView Control 5.0 (SP2)" instead of "Microsoft TreeView Control 6.0 (SP6)" and "Microsoft Windows Common Controls 5.0 (SP2) Version 1.3" It works on my PC, but when I export the VI to another PC it's seems it fall back to "Microsoft TreeView Control 6.0 (SP6)":(
  4. Bjarne Joergensen
    I tried to download VBRT, but it didn't help. I don't know if it's a part of it?. When you have to register things in SysWOW64 , do you then use Regsvr32?
  5. Bjarne Joergensen
    Edit: I found this "mscomctl.ocx" under SysVow64. I have registered it, but LabVIEW still say it's not registered! Has it something to do with LV15 =32bit and "msconctl.ocx" is in 64bit system folder?
  6. Bjarne Joergensen
    Hi I got an old LabVIEW 8.2 VI that use ITreeView under Windows XP. It works fine. Now I have upgraded to LV15 and Windows 8.1 and I got an error "Library not registered in mxLT Open Tree Control.vi" I would like register the library, but where do I find it? I have search the WEB but didn't find anything i could use(or understand;)) Edit: I found this "mscomctl.ocx" under SysVow64. I have registered it, but LabVIEW still say it's not registered! Has it something to do with LV15 =32bit and "msconctl.ocx" is in 64bit system folder? Here is the BD of "mxLT Open Tree Cont
  7. Bjarne Joergensen
    Please don't misunderstand me ? My intention was to remind my developer group to remember the prefix on the file names and make them sure they don't want the prefix if they try to save without!
  8. Bjarne Joergensen
    HI When saving a new VI LabVIEW default name it "Untitled#x.vi". Is is possible to change that to something else like "TSVWS - #x.vi" An maybe also popup a warning if you try to rename i without "TSVWS - " as prefix. regards Bjarne
  9. Bjarne Joergensen
    Hi ShaunR - polynomium 0x755b - initial_crc 0xffff - reversering af 8-bit input data - reversering af 16-bit output crc
  10. Bjarne Joergensen
    Hi I have done that and can't find any CRC calculator that give the same result I got these data: 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x80, 0xe2, 0x45, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x07, 0xdf, 0x33, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x0f, 0xeb, 0x02, 0x80, 0xe2, 0x45, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00 and expect this CRC16: 0xcd58 regards Bjarne
  11. Bjarne Joergensen
    Hi I have this code in C(and I don't understand it ) Is there someone that can help me translate it to labview? Thanks in advance. Bjarne typedef uint16_t (*bit_order_16)(uint16_t); typedef uint8_t (*bit_order_8)(uint8_t); uint16_t straight_16(uint16_t value) { return value; } uint16_t reverse_16(uint16_t value) { uint16_t reversed = 0; for (int i = 0; i < 16; ++i) { reversed <<= 1; reversed |= value & 0x1; value >>= 1; } return reversed; } uint8_t straight_8(uint8_t value)
  12. Bjarne Joergensen
    Made the VIT and it works Thanks Bjarne
  13. Bjarne Joergensen
    Thanks hooovahh I'v done it with Labview Server this way I have to dive in the static VI references and Start Asynchronous calls because I also use LV2013 /Bjarne PS: How does a "wholly crap cake" look like
  14. Bjarne Joergensen
    Hi I have a challenge on a test system. I have a PCB where there is an IC to be uploaded with the code. It takes ~5 min. per. PCB. To follow takt time it must be possible to program up to 5 at a time. It should be done in the way that the operator can start a PCB independent of the other PCBs are startet! Programming is startet and monitored as follows. 1. The operator sets an SD card in the PCB and press start. 2. The test opens a serial port to the board and turn on the power to the board 3. PCB runs the programming process itself and sends information via the serial port. 4. The test
  15. Bjarne Joergensen
    Don't you hook it up to a device? /Bjarne
  16. Bjarne Joergensen
    I would prefer that too
  17. Bjarne Joergensen
    Yes, I found it. I did'nt see the / as a directory I will talk to some of my college with C++ experience thanks Bjarne
  18. Bjarne Joergensen
    With some fooling around and started to add the image to the SDCard, but it is so slow compared to win32diskimager. Maybe I need to add some parameters. I used this : dd. if=C:\sd_2gb.img of=/dev/sdb count=1M Rolf, where do you find the file "src/disk.c"? I can't find it in the installation of win32diskimager /Bjarne
  19. Bjarne Joergensen
    Hi In our automated testsystem, I need to write a .img file to a SD-Card with Labview. Has anyone tried that and could recomend a solution? I have tried to mingle with Cygwin and dd, but I can't get it to work. thanks in advance Bjarne
  20. Bjarne Joergensen
    Hi rolfk Thank you. I don't think I understand it all, but what I need is the UTC time in ticks and I can get that from .net. I don't need the timestamp format, although it would be nice and easy to read:-). I have made a .net dll and call it in labview and getting what I want. regards Bjarne
  21. Bjarne Joergensen
    Hi I need the UTC time and convert it to tics. I use this code(LV2012/DotNet 2.0): Why is the Now time(local) the same as UTCtime. There should be a difference of 2 hours! I made a program in C# and it is showing the right time (2 hours between Local and UTC) regards Bjarne
  22. Bjarne Joergensen
    Yes, you are right. I would also use semaphore's if it was in the same application, but in my task I needed it for interaction between two different app's So I'm glad that we found out how to use mutex regards Bjarne
  23. Bjarne Joergensen
    Hi candidus Thank you for the reply. When I was waiting for an answer, a colleague of mine has worked on it too and got it to work in LV. First off all, there was a little bug in the first snippet I posted. The Parameter "initially owned" has to be set to FALSE. It works fine if you share the mutex between two different version of LV Two .exe two VIs running in different instance of the same LV version.(http://labviewwiki.org/Multiple_Instances_of_LabVIEW - other Methods). Here is the new snippet: best regards Bjarne
  24. Bjarne Joergensen
    Hi No one who has a solution? Is it not possible to do with .net? Is it a bug in labview? regards Bjarne
  25. Bjarne Joergensen
    Thank you Mads It could be a solution, but I would prefer to use Mutex because in a near future I have another task where I shall syncronize with a DOT_NET program that use mutexes. Regards Bjarne
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

  I accept