Mark Yedinak Posted April 30, 2009 Report Share Posted April 30, 2009 QUOTE (ShaunR @ Apr 29 2009, 05:42 AM) I'm thinking more about the cost of deployment. Exes and dll's are don't require licensing.I'd find it impossible to justify that the customer pays thousands for a full package which he/she never uses just so that they can use my software. Actually a deployment license is only $500. Granted, you still have a license cost per installation but they do not have to purchase the entire TestStand license. These deployments work essentially the same as a standalone LabVIEW application with the runtime engine. Quote Link to comment
ShaunR Posted April 30, 2009 Report Share Posted April 30, 2009 QUOTE (Mark Yedinak @ Apr 29 2009, 03:50 PM) Actually a deployment license is only $500. Granted, you still have a license cost per installation but they do not have to purchase the entire TestStand license. These deployments work essentially the same as a standalone LabVIEW application with the runtime engine. We were talking about a full Labview development environment my comment was aimed at this QUOTE The LV development environment is very useful in debugging on the fly if you have live code. NI even supports it with a licensing option. Since the OP said he deploys the vi's and anyone can change them (have to have labview on there for that). That is more than $500. Quote Link to comment
Mark Yedinak Posted April 30, 2009 Report Share Posted April 30, 2009 QUOTE (ShaunR @ Apr 29 2009, 10:26 AM) We were talking about a full Labview development environment my comment was aimed at thisSince the OP said he deploys the vi's and anyone can change them (have to have labview on there for that). That is more than $500. But the full development license of LabVIEW is NOT required to run a TestStand deployment. Trust me, we are deploying systems here without a full license of either LabVIEW or TestStand installed on the machine. The LabVIEW runtime engine gets installed and a deployment license of TestStand is installed. The only cost for the deployed system is the $500 TestStand deployment license. Quote Link to comment
ShaunR Posted May 1, 2009 Report Share Posted May 1, 2009 QUOTE (Mark Yedinak @ Apr 29 2009, 09:53 PM) But the full development license of LabVIEW is NOT required to run a TestStand deployment. Trust me, we are deploying systems here without a full license of either LabVIEW or TestStand installed on the machine. The LabVIEW runtime engine gets installed and a deployment license of TestStand is installed. The only cost for the deployed system is the $500 TestStand deployment license. Read the thread again from 7 posts up. Quote Link to comment
Mark Yedinak Posted May 1, 2009 Report Share Posted May 1, 2009 QUOTE (ShaunR @ Apr 29 2009, 06:07 PM) Read the thread again from 7 posts up. Yes, and my statements still stand. NI provides means to install and uninstall the LabVIEW development environment for debugging purposes. I imagine they do for TestStand as well. However, neither development environments are required and therefore deployment costs for a TestStand system are limited to the TestStand deployment license. Systems generally aren't deployed which support full development environments. If that is what you want then yes there is additional costs but that is a different breed of a deployed product. Quote Link to comment
Avital_Testview Posted March 28, 2017 Report Share Posted March 28, 2017 Almost 8 years later and there's a new test sequencing tool called TVI: http://tvi.co TVI offers test sequences creation and reporting engine and is very easy to use. It is aimed for teams who are considering a 3rd party test management tool, but are not ready yet to jump on the full scale that TestStand offers. Disclosure: I'm affiliated with Testview, makers of TVI. 1 Quote Link to comment
Elena Lombrozo Posted February 8, 2022 Report Share Posted February 8, 2022 Anyone this is still relevant for - If your looking for a LabVIEW(TM) based testing framework that covers multi-unit testing, as well as multi-product configuration, sequence editors, dynamic test loading and just something that is generally very intuitive, practical, and easy to use, you should check out TVI. 1 Quote Link to comment
Omer Nachon Posted February 8, 2022 Report Share Posted February 8, 2022 On 3/28/2017 at 1:44 PM, Avital_Testview said: Almost 8 years later and there's a new test sequencing tool called TVI: http://tvi.co TVI offers test sequences creation and reporting engine and is very easy to use. It is aimed for teams who are considering a 3rd party test management tool, but are not ready yet to jump on the full scale that TestStand offers. Disclosure: I'm affiliated with Testview, makers of TVI. Reminding all of you that this software just kept on developing in the last few years, and that it's affordable, and that it's super intuitive 1 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.