Leaderboard

You can also press Ctrl-Shift-E from an open VI to select that VI in the project explorer.

Like I said, the only thing preventing me is the *hardware* to test on. Software is not really a barrier for me or the platform "type" because I'm not particularly clever, but I am persistent I pretty much have a one click (well, 3 click) process for producing the binaries for all the platforms (except VxWorks) now so the overhead of creating them has been solved. No-one is asking for these platforms so it is really my own satisfaction in striving for completeness. Virtual machines would be better if, and only if, there isn't a cost associated and they accurately reflect the hardware target. Because the API is free, there isn't a lot of incentive go out and spend real money on expensive NI hardware on the offchance that someone *might* use it. The only realistic way new platforms will be added (if no VMs are available) is through sponsorship or someone donates a device. I did go out and buy a VxWorks (6.3) RIO - quite a while ago now - because that only left the PXI racks (Pharlap ETS) at the time but obviously more platforms have been released since then. My own self satisfaction isn't enough for me to spend more of my own money on hardware just for testing once or twice a year when the burden of maintaining the binaries is not trivial and no-one really wants them. Just to be clear, though. This is a mainly a support issue. The API probably does work on those platforms with the standard SQLite binaries but even then I cannot support those platforms without test targets.