Francois Normandin

@Azer Ader, you do not need .NET stream. Just use the native TCP socket. I recommend you read all incoming bytes and pass them down to a decoding loop. Here's an un-tested example code. You'll need to unflatten the bytes to image base on your image format. client_for_tcp_video_server.vi

@sts123 You can explore the String palette where you will find an array of string formatting nodes. The simplest for you is to replace the date/time string with Format into string, and configure for scientific number.

Can you check if you are facing the same problem as in this thread?

resizing_subpanels.vi @jhoskins, I'm not sure which part you were having problems with, but here is an example with loads of empty subpanels. It is already slow without any panels loaded in, so definitely not something you can use in any "reactive" UI without having to recompute the whole positions. What I'm saying is that it won't work if you expect to recompute on Pane Resize user events... From some trials and errors, I think the Windows Bounds to Rectangle is not the most useful method to get the "Owner Pane" rectangle, so I just fudged it to roughly account for scrollbars. It's not a perfect mathematical calculation because the distance with the sides is not really constant as a function of subpanel size and pane size.

Hi Richard, I was referring to the Save a Copy on a LVLIB that contains classes A and A1, instead of saving individual classes sequentially. You'd start with Template.lvlib:A.lvclass * Template.lvlib:A1.lvclass, and end up with Clone.lvlib:A.lvclass & Clone.lvlib:A1.lvclass Your new clone lvlib will maintain the linkage within its own namespace. It then becomes a renaming operation for the Clone.lvlib:AX.lvclass to Clone.lvlib:BX.lvclass This only work if your template has all dependent classes in the same lvlib, hence why I called that a "special case". Your solution is more generic. Even when I don't want the classes to end up in the same lvlib, I prefer to extract them after they have been cloned...

In the special case where your A and A1 classes are in the same lvlib, you can simply clone the whole lvlib to have linkage preserved and rename to B and B1.

Hi @ThomasGutzler, you've certainly figured the answer or switched library by now. For those who would be looking for the same thing here, this is a thread on github issues that discusses the same thing: https://github.com/LabVIEW-Open-Source/MQTT-Client/issues/13

0-BSD is the only OSI-certified license that gives the same level of restrictions as Public Domain, while still, as you well know from those other presentations you referred to, being recognized in (almost) all countries. Public domain and The Unlicense are not recognized universally. Like Shaun points out, the biggest worry is that someone can claim my work as theirs because the license is open enough that you can copy any part, or the whole, without attribution. Honestly, I don't think the prospect of someone claiming I cheated would meet any level of credibility, since all the development is done in a 3rd-party public repository and I never squash my commits. Easy to prove I went through the development process and I couldn't temper with the commit hashes/timestamps of those commits. You can see all the mistakes, dead-ends, reworks, fixes... Anyway, whether or not you use a more restrictive license would not prevent someone from falsely claiming their work predates yours. If that were to happen, I trust the LabVIEW Community will hold the reputation of the original developer. If the work you want to release is owned by a company, I would recommend to not use 0-BSD. Make sure there is at least an attribution clause.

I think this NI library is a good start: https://www.vipm.io/package/ni_lib_rt_management/ Other options are NI-RAD (image replication), WebDAV, FTP (not recommended) and NI System Configuration. Some more generic info for you to read: https://www.ni.com/en-us/innovations/white-papers/12/simplify-the-deployment-and-replication-of-distributed-systems.html

Hi @Marko Hakkarainen, your "Test Labels" example is broken. Accessors (Write Label) is not public. Perhaps wrapping it into a generic Collection constructor method?

No you cannot. Your simplified example, if the interface is truly abstract, is equivalent to trying to prevent someone from dropping a "empty string constant" on the block diagram. Fundamentally though, it would prevent you from using the direct cast to exercise the override, as shown in the bottom example. The only restriction is that one cannot create a DVR of the interface from outside the interface itself. I have to admit that I have not investigated the consequence of such a pattern in the context of interfaces...

This is not strictly the answer to your question, but if you only use this for elapsed time, I suggest you switch to UTC time instead... There is no daylight savings time in UTC frame of reference, so you are certain it won't hit you. Also, here's a library (shameless plug) you might find useful: https://www.vipm.io/package/labview_open_source_lib_epoch_datetime/ It serves Unix, GPS and ISO time, including support for leap years (and even leap seconds... all 37 of them)

It makes sense if one thinks of it as "6 letters added to the decimal notation".

I typically use a second lvproj file, not for installers, but for the unit testing. The benefit is that I can segregate the dependency on the unit test framework (i.e. Caraya) from the source file that runs the build specs. Although, I don't know if that's super useful if you use a CI server to run both UTs and perform your builds...