crelf

Only 1 week to go before entries close - so get your designin' on people!

I agree - if I can build an exe with a version number <1, then I should be able to do the same with an installer.

I hate to say it, but if you don't get the dialog when you press ctrl+e, then you don't have any diagrams. It looks like the your ex-developer stripped them out. There are many motivations to do this, not all of them nefarious: it's sometimes a good idea when distributing code. Your least painful route might be to contact the develop to see if they have a backup with the diagrams in place. Can you upload a vi here and we'll take a look at it to confirm?

Are you working locally? If so, this might help.

Nec audiendi qui solent dicere, Vox populi, vox Dei, quum tumultuositas vulgi semper insaniae proxima sit.

Done. You can use the report to moderator for anything you want mods to see.

It's where we host the OpenG project. Never had any issues with it - we push it around a fair bit and it's always worked fine.

I've always used sourceforge.

A reminder that time's running out people - get your entries in!

Excellent topic guys. I agree that using the term QSM is a misnomer, and we should use QMH (queued message handler) or the like instead.

Did you try this?

Hmmm - I'd start by closing the references you open on the fly - put a close reference downstream on both the "body" and "innerHTML" nodes and see if that makes a difference.

Wow - so when I first read that I thought, surely not: depending on what you're doing, the 1410 and 1411 could be good replacements, but on looking at NI's site, it looks like all of their analog frame grabbers are listed as obsolete...

How big of a "system" is it? Would it be prohibitive to have someone come in and fix the issue, rather than throwing better hardware at it (which might actualy make it worse)? What's the OS that's it's running on? Unfrotuntately, upgrading a system isn't usually just about a new processor, it's about all the things that come along with it

This issue could be one or a combination of a bunch of things: can you upload your code for us to take a look at?

It looks like you've got a list of channels (maybe in a 1D array), and that list has duplicates in it - but I can't tell much more than that from the error dialog. Can you upload your code?

I used the NI 5431 Arbitrary Video Generator and the LanBIEW toolkit that came with it (don't remember its name) to generate the signal to a test screen, then an oscilliscope to read a converted video signal back - it wasn't too difficult to find the scan lines programmatically, but you need to know your signal pretty well (blanking lines, forward/reverse rasters/color burst location/etc). There are several substandards to the PAL standard, and you'll need to know what you're using. I sent SMPTE color bars, gradient test patterns, etc, to the device, and seeing the colors back on the scope was pretty easy. Sicne I did my project, NI has come out with their NI Video Master cards, which would be an easier option: http://sine.ni.com/nips/cds/view/p/lang/en/nid/205781

"Motors" is a big topic - there are so many different kinds and sub kinds, and each motor (and motor controller) manufacturer has different way of controlling them (often mutliple simultaneous ways). Are you using the NI-Motion toolkit (it's a LabVIEW plugin)? Can you give us the manufacturer and model of the motors and motor controllers? How are you planning on talking to them (RS-232, 0-10V analog signal, ethernet, etc)? I suggest you talk to the lecturer who gave you this task, and see what their suggestions are - they might even have some code that you can use.

Tell us why you're concerned - was there something that wasn't in the practise exam that hit you for a six?

Sure - branch the wire into two wires, and you have 2 objects. That's the difference between by-value and by-reference designs: LVOOP allows you to do by-value.