Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/27/2016 in all areas

  1. See here: http://www.mail-archive.com/sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org/msg53058.html It comes from the fact that SQLLite is a file based database, not a server based one. The SQL Lite shared library is the entire SQL Lite database engine, but as DLL it gets loaded into each process seperately and does not share any state from another SQL Lite shared library engine in another process. It does use file range locking (when enabled in the build) in order to maintain some kind of consistency even if two processes happen to modify the data concurrently. And it apparently does at least under Windows (when enabled in the build) use file notifications to get informed about changes from other processes but in order to detect what has changed it then has to read in all the data again and update its internal management information so I'm not sure why it would work under Windows like Shaun claims. Basically the fact that SQL Lite is a file based database more or less makes what you want pretty impossible. The solution most people have come up with is to add an extra table which stores records about changes to tables and then query that regularly, possible with a file change notification callback mechanisme to avoid to much polling.
    1 point
  2. My understanding is there is corporate versions that do not or can be set to not update automatically. This may not be the stock Dell computer, though.
    1 point
  3. So it looks like I won't be able to continue my LabVIEW development in the near future (or at least have a major break) *sadface* Is anyone interested in continuing development of the project? It is now at the point where all dependencies to web services have been removed and replaced with web sockets. That means the page for the front panel can be viewed via file:// protocol and doesn't require a http:// any more. Web socket connection is established to a configurable port. It can handle multiple clients (how ever stupid that may be to give control over a single system to multiple users; makes sense if they're all indicators). It supports a bunch of common controls that can be represented as HTML5 and it supports representing any control as an image. I've implemented a basic config editor that can be used to select if a control should be represented as HTML or image. Current version is attached. FPPublisher.zip
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.